Royal Enfield Himalayan 410 2022 vs. BMW G 310 R 2020

Royal Enfield Himalayan 410 2022

BMW G 310 R 2020
Loading...
Technical Specifications Royal Enfield Himalayan 410 2022 compared to BMW G 310 R 2020
Royal Enfield Himalayan 410 2022
BMW G 310 R 2020
Engine and Drive Train
| Bore | Bore | 78 mm | Bore | 80 mm |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stroke | Stroke | 86 mm | Stroke | 62 mm |
| Engine power | Engine power | 24 HP | Engine power | 34 HP |
| Rpm at Max. Power | Rpm at Max. Power | 6,500 rpm | Rpm at Max. Power | 9,500 rpm |
| Torque | Torque | 32 Nm | Torque | 28 Nm |
| Rpm at Torque | Rpm at Torque | 4,250 rpm | Rpm at Torque | 7,500 rpm |
| Compression Ratio | Compression Ratio | 9.5 | Compression Ratio | 10.6 |
| Fuel system | Fuel system | Injection | Fuel system | Injection |
| Starter | Starter | Electric | Starter | Electric |
| Clutch Type | Clutch Type | Multiplate in oil-bath | Clutch Type | Multiplate in oil-bath |
| Transmission | Transmission | Chain | Transmission | Chain |
| Transmission Type | Transmission Type | Gearshift | Transmission Type | Gearshift |
| Number of gears | Number of gears | 5 | Number of gears | 6 |
| Cylinders | Cylinders | 1 | Cylinders | 1 |
| Strokes | Strokes | 4-Stroke | Strokes | 4-Stroke |
| Valves | Valves | OHV | Valves | DOHC |
| Cooling | Cooling | Air | Cooling | liquid |
| Displacement | Displacement | 411 ccm | Displacement | 313 ccm |
Suspension Front
| Front suspension | Front suspension | Telescopic fork | Front suspension | Upside-Down telescopic fork |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diameter | Diameter | 41 mm | Diameter | 41 mm |
| Travel | Travel | 200 mm | Travel | 140 mm |
Suspension Rear
| Suspension | Suspension | Swing arm | Suspension | Swing arm |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shock absorber | Shock absorber | Monoshock | Shock absorber | Monoshock |
| Travel | Travel | 180 mm | Travel | 131 mm |
| Material | Material | Steel | Material | Aluminium |
Chassis
| Frame | Frame | Steel | Frame | Steel |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Frame type | Frame type | Double cradle | Frame type | Tubular |
Brakes Front
| Type | Type | Single disk | Type | Single disk |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diameter | Diameter | 300 mm | Diameter | 300 mm |
Brakes Rear
| Type | Type | Disc | Type | Disc |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diameter | Diameter | 240 mm | Diameter | 240 mm |
Assistance Systems
| Advanced Rider Assistance Systems | Advanced Rider Assistance Systems | ABS | Advanced Rider Assistance Systems | ABS |
|---|
Dimensions and Weights
| Front tyre width | Front tyre width | 90 mm | Front tyre width | 110 mm |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Front tyre height | Front tyre height | 90 % | Front tyre height | 70 % |
| Front tyre diameter | Front tyre diameter | 21 inch | Front tyre diameter | 17 inch |
| Rear tyre width | Rear tyre width | 120 mm | Rear tyre width | 150 mm |
| Rear tyre height | Rear tyre height | 90 % | Rear tyre height | 60 % |
| Rear tyre diameter | Rear tyre diameter | 17 inch | Rear tyre diameter | 17 inch |
| Length | Length | 2,190 mm | Length | 1,988 mm |
| Width | Width | 840 mm | Width | 896 mm |
| Wheelbase | Wheelbase | 1,465 mm | Wheelbase | 1,374 mm |
| Seat Height | Seat Height | 800 mm | Seat Height | 785 mm |
| Kerb Weight (with ABS) | Kerb Weight (with ABS) | 199 kg | Kerb Weight (with ABS) | 158.5 kg |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | Fuel Tank Capacity | 15 l | Fuel Tank Capacity | 11 l |
| Top Speed | Top Speed | 127 km/h | Top Speed | 145 km/h |
| License compliancy | License compliancy | A2 | License compliancy | A2 |
Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Royal Enfield Himalayan 410 vs BMW G 310 R
Price Royal Enfield Himalayan 410
Model year
Current average market prices
Price BMW G 310 R
Model year
Current average market prices



















