Kawasaki ER-6n 2008 vs. Kawasaki Z650 2020

Kawasaki ER-6n 2008

Kawasaki ER-6n 2008

Kawasaki Z650 2020

Kawasaki Z650 2020

Loading...

Overview - Kawasaki ER-6n 2008 vs Kawasaki Z650 2020

The Kawasaki ER-6n 2008 and the Kawasaki Z650 2020 are both naked bikes with similar engine specifications. Both models have a two-cylinder engine with a displacement of 649cc and liquid cooling. However, there are some differences in their power output. The ER-6n 2008 has a slightly higher engine power of 72 HP, while the Z650 2020 has a power output of 68.2 HP.

In terms of dimensions and weights, the two models have slight variations. The ER-6n 2008 has a wheelbase of 1405mm, while the Z650 2020 has a slightly longer wheelbase of 1410mm. The seat height of the ER-6n 2008 is 785mm, whereas the Z650 2020 has a slightly higher seat height of 790mm. Both models have a fuel tank capacity of around 15 liters, with the ER-6n 2008 having a slightly larger capacity of 15.5 liters.

Kawasaki ER-6n 2008

Kawasaki ER-6n 2008

Now let's discuss the strengths of each model. The Kawasaki ER-6n 2008 is praised for its lightness, precision, and rideability. It has a modern and dynamic look, making it visually appealing. The bike is considered beginner-friendly and has trustworthy ergonomics. Additionally, the ER-6n 2008 comes with ABS, providing added safety and control.

On the other hand, the Kawasaki Z650 2020 boasts a powerful two-cylinder engine that delivers a thrilling riding experience. It is known for its aggressive intake noise, adding to the excitement. The Z650 2020 has compact dimensions, making it easy to maneuver in urban environments. It also has a low seat height, which is beneficial for riders with shorter legs. The bike features a stable chassis and a TFT display with connectivity, offering a modern and tech-savvy experience. Lastly, the Z650 2020 has a more mature and grown-up look compared to its predecessor.

However, both models have some weaknesses. The Kawasaki ER-6n 2008 has a sitting position that may be uncomfortable for riders taller than 1.80m, as the footrests are not ideally positioned. Additionally, the ER-6n 2008 is not particularly suitable for performing wheelies.

Kawasaki Z650 2020

Kawasaki Z650 2020

On the other hand, the Kawasaki Z650 2020 has a front brake pressure point that may not be to everyone's liking. It is also speculated that tall riders may find the bike uncomfortable due to its design. Furthermore, the Rideology App, which offers connectivity features, may not be as sophisticated as some riders would prefer.

In conclusion, both the Kawasaki ER-6n 2008 and the Kawasaki Z650 2020 have their own strengths and weaknesses. The ER-6n 2008 offers a lightweight and beginner-friendly option with ABS, while the Z650 2020 provides a powerful and thrilling riding experience with modern features. Ultimately, the choice between the two models depends on the rider's preferences and priorities.

Technical Specifications Kawasaki ER-6n 2008 compared to Kawasaki Z650 2020

Kawasaki ER-6n 2008
Kawasaki Z650 2020

Engine and Drive Train

Engine powerEngine power72 HPEngine power68.2 HP
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders2Cylinders2
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement649 ccmDisplacement649 ccm

Dimensions and Weights

WheelbaseWheelbase1,405 mmWheelbase1,410 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height785 mmSeat Height790 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity15.5 lFuel Tank Capacity15 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Kawasaki ER-6n 2008

Kawasaki ER-6n 2008

Kawasaki doesn't build toys. The ER-6N is getting more serious - and remains beginner-friendly.

Lightness

precision

rideability

modern, dynamic look

beginner-friendly

trustworthy ergonomics

ABS.

Sitting position with regard to the footrests uncomfortable from 1.80m

hardly suitable for wheelies

Kawasaki Z650 2020

Kawasaki Z650 2020

It's simply marvellous what Kawasaki has put together in a complete package with the new Z650. The technical components may not knock your socks off individually, but in combination they make for a pleasantly neutral motorbike that everyone will enjoy. No bitchy idiosyncrasies - simply a naked bike that works really well on winding country roads. Of course, the TFT display, which we don't find in the competition at the moment, is a plus, as is the grown-up look, which is strongly oriented towards the larger Z models. Only the pressure point of the front brake could have been more clearly defined - but you can't have everything in this price range.

powerful two-cylinder engine

aggressive intake noise

compact dimensions

low seat height

stable chassis

TFT display with connectivity

grown-up look

Front brake pressure point

probably uncomfortable for tall riders

Rideology Appn och not 100% sophisticated.

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Kawasaki ER-6n vs Kawasaki Z650

There are a few key differences between a Kawasaki ER-6n 2008 and a Kawasaki Z650 2020. It takes less time to sell a Kawasaki ER-6n with 57 days compared to 80 days for a Kawasaki Z650. Since model year 2006 1000PS.de editors have written 16 reviews for the Kawasaki ER-6n and 31 reviews for the Kawasaki Z650 since model year 2017. The first review for the Kawasaki ER-6n was published on 29/06/2005 and now has more than 11,200 views. This compares to more than 25,000 views for the first review on Kawasaki Z650 published on 08/11/2016.

Price Kawasaki ER-6n

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Kawasaki Z650

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH