Brixton Felsberg 125 2022 vs. Royal Enfield Himalayan 410 2022

Brixton Felsberg 125 2022

Royal Enfield Himalayan 410 2022
Loading...
Technical Specifications Brixton Felsberg 125 2022 compared to Royal Enfield Himalayan 410 2022
Brixton Felsberg 125 2022
Royal Enfield Himalayan 410 2022
Engine and Drive Train
| Engine power | Engine power | 11 HP | Engine power | 24 HP |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rpm at Max. Power | Rpm at Max. Power | 9,000 rpm | Rpm at Max. Power | 6,500 rpm |
| Torque | Torque | 9.7 Nm | Torque | 32 Nm |
| Rpm at Torque | Rpm at Torque | 6,500 rpm | Rpm at Torque | 4,250 rpm |
| Fuel system | Fuel system | Injection | Fuel system | Injection |
| Starter | Starter | Electric | Starter | Electric |
| Transmission | Transmission | Chain | Transmission | Chain |
| Transmission Type | Transmission Type | Gearshift | Transmission Type | Gearshift |
| Number of gears | Number of gears | 5 | Number of gears | 5 |
| Cylinders | Cylinders | 1 | Cylinders | 1 |
| Strokes | Strokes | 4-Stroke | Strokes | 4-Stroke |
| Cooling | Cooling | Air | Cooling | Air |
| Displacement | Displacement | 125 ccm | Displacement | 411 ccm |
Suspension Front
| Front suspension | Front suspension | Telescopic fork | Front suspension | Telescopic fork |
|---|
Suspension Rear
| Suspension | Suspension | Swing arm | Suspension | Swing arm |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shock absorber | Shock absorber | Dual Shock | Shock absorber | Monoshock |
| Material | Material | Steel | Material | Steel |
Chassis
| Frame | Frame | Steel | Frame | Steel |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Frame type | Frame type | Double cradle | Frame type | Double cradle |
Brakes Front
| Type | Type | Single disk | Type | Single disk |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diameter | Diameter | 276 mm | Diameter | 300 mm |
Brakes Rear
| Type | Type | Disc | Type | Disc |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diameter | Diameter | 220 mm | Diameter | 240 mm |
Assistance Systems
| Advanced Rider Assistance Systems | Advanced Rider Assistance Systems | ABS, Combined Brake System | Advanced Rider Assistance Systems | ABS |
|---|
Dimensions and Weights
| Front tyre width | Front tyre width | 100 mm | Front tyre width | 90 mm |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Front tyre height | Front tyre height | 90 % | Front tyre height | 90 % |
| Front tyre diameter | Front tyre diameter | 18 inch | Front tyre diameter | 21 inch |
| Rear tyre width | Rear tyre width | 120 mm | Rear tyre width | 120 mm |
| Rear tyre height | Rear tyre height | 80 % | Rear tyre height | 90 % |
| Rear tyre diameter | Rear tyre diameter | 17 inch | Rear tyre diameter | 17 inch |
| Length | Length | 2,020 mm | Length | 2,190 mm |
| Width | Width | 850 mm | Width | 840 mm |
| Height | Height | 1,105 mm | Height | 1,370 mm |
| Wheelbase | Wheelbase | 1,320 mm | Wheelbase | 1,465 mm |
| Seat Height | Seat Height | 800 mm | Seat Height | 800 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | Fuel Tank Capacity | 14 l | Fuel Tank Capacity | 15 l |
| Top Speed | Top Speed | 99 km/h | Top Speed | 127 km/h |
| Range | Range | 560 km | Range | 500 km |
| Combined CO2 emissions | Combined CO2 emissions | 57 g/km | Combined CO2 emissions | 76.5 g/km |
| Combined fuel consumption | Combined fuel consumption | 2.5 l/100km | Combined fuel consumption | 3.18 l/100km |
Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Brixton Felsberg 125 vs Royal Enfield Himalayan 410
Price Brixton Felsberg 125
Model year
Current average market prices
Price Royal Enfield Himalayan 410
Model year
Current average market prices


















