Yamaha MT-09 2013 vs. Kawasaki Z900 2017

Yamaha MT-09 2013

Yamaha MT-09 2013

Kawasaki Z900 2017

Kawasaki Z900 2017

Loading...

Overview - Yamaha MT-09 2013 vs Kawasaki Z900 2017

The Yamaha MT-09 2013 and the Kawasaki Z900 2017 are both naked bikes that offer powerful engines and impressive performance. However, there are some notable differences between the two models.

In terms of engine specifications, the Yamaha MT-09 2013 is equipped with an in-line, 3-cylinder engine with a displacement of 847cc. It produces 115 horsepower and 87.5 Nm of torque. On the other hand, the Kawasaki Z900 2017 features an in-line, 4-cylinder engine with a displacement of 948cc. It delivers a higher power output of 125.4 horsepower and 98.6 Nm of torque. This indicates that the Z900 has a more powerful engine compared to the MT-09.

Both bikes have similar front suspension setups, with telescopic forks providing a smooth and comfortable ride. However, the Z900 has an upside-down telescopic fork, which is known for its better performance and improved handling.

Yamaha MT-09 2013

Yamaha MT-09 2013

In terms of chassis, the Yamaha MT-09 2013 features an aluminum frame with a twin tube design. This provides a lightweight and rigid structure, contributing to the bike's agility and maneuverability. On the other hand, the Kawasaki Z900 2017 has a steel frame with a double cradle design, which offers stability and durability.

Both bikes have double disc brakes at the front, ensuring efficient and reliable stopping power. The dimensions and weights of the two models are quite similar, with both having a front tire width of 120mm and a rear tire width of 180mm. They also share the same wheelbase length of around 1450mm.

In terms of seat height, the Yamaha MT-09 2013 has a slightly higher seat at 815mm, while the Kawasaki Z900 2017 offers a lower seat height of 795mm. This may be a consideration for taller riders who may find the knee angle on the Z900 to be narrow. However, it is worth noting that the seat can be replaced to accommodate taller riders.

In terms of strengths, the Yamaha MT-09 2013 is praised for its reasonable price and powerful engine. It offers a good balance between performance and affordability. On the other hand, the Kawasaki Z900 2017 is commended for its ingenious naked bike chassis, superb looks, and a highly responsive engine with perfectly dimensioned torque. It is considered to be a well-rounded bike that offers a great combination of performance, price, and practicality.

Kawasaki Z900 2017

Kawasaki Z900 2017

However, the Yamaha MT-09 2013 does have some weaknesses. It is known for having a hard chassis, which may result in a less comfortable ride on rough roads. Additionally, it has a relatively high fuel consumption, which may be a consideration for riders looking for a more fuel-efficient option.

The Kawasaki Z900 2017 also has a weakness, particularly for taller riders. The knee angle on the bike is narrow, which may cause discomfort during long rides. However, this can be addressed by ordering a different seat that provides better ergonomics for taller individuals.

In conclusion, both the Yamaha MT-09 2013 and the Kawasaki Z900 2017 are impressive naked bikes with their own strengths and weaknesses. The MT-09 offers a powerful engine at a reasonable price, while the Z900 provides a well-designed chassis, great looks, and an engine that delivers excellent performance. Riders should consider their own preferences and priorities when choosing between these two models.

Technical Specifications Yamaha MT-09 2013 compared to Kawasaki Z900 2017

Yamaha MT-09 2013
Kawasaki Z900 2017

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore78 mmBore73.4 mm
StrokeStroke59.1 mmStroke56 mm
Engine powerEngine power115 HPEngine power125.4 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power10,000 rpmRpm at Max. Power9,500 rpm
TorqueTorque87.5 NmTorque98.6 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque8,500 rpmRpm at Torque7,700 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio11.5 Compression Ratio11.8
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders3Cylinders4
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesDOHC
DisplacementDisplacement847 ccmDisplacement948 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionTelescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameSteel
Frame typeFrame typeTwin TubeFrame typeDouble cradle

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width180 mmRear tyre width180 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,075 mmLength2,070 mm
WidthWidth815 mmWidth820 mm
HeightHeight1,135 mmHeight1,065 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,440 mmWheelbase1,450 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height815 mmSeat Height795 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)191 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)210 kg
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Yamaha MT-09 2013

Yamaha MT-09 2013

The Yamaha MT-09 did not need to be reinvented for the coming season - it already was extremely well done almost four years ago. Instead, the Japanese focus on fine-tuning and adding practical, contemporary gimmicks such as traction control and automatic shifting. Due to the Euro4 standard, however, the engine management has been changed once again and offers an emphatically powerful but well controllable power delivery in standard mode; the power explosion of the first generation is now no longer offered even by the sharper A mode. The biggest change, recognisable at first glance, is the, in my opinion, extremely successful design with the more aggressive front and the newly designed rear. All in all, an even snazzier naked bike that was clearly built for the fun of motorcycling.

Wonderfully powerful three-cylinder powerplant

three power modes

fully adjustable chassis

quickshifter as standard

sporty upright seating position

good brakes

aggressive looks

traction control.

Saddle a little too hard for long tours

licence plate holder on the swingarm offers less splash protection than a conventional one

Kawasaki Z900 2017

Kawasaki Z900 2017

Fortunately, the new Kawasaki Z900 has lost none of its character through the use of electronics. It is and remains a playful mid-range naked bike, which at the same time masters the brisk pace on the country road magnificently. The riding pleasure and suitability for everyday use are high, the now installed riding aids offer a plus in safety. Your opponents will have a really hard time from now on.

Light and natural handling with high stability

Silky engine with full pull from mid revs

High chassis transparency, great feedback

Sitting position with feel-good factor

Fair price

TFT display mounted too low

Cumbersome menu operation

Rear view mirrors offer modest visibility

Price Comparison Average Market Price Yamaha MT-09 vs Kawasaki Z900

There are a few key differences between a Yamaha MT-09 2013 and a Kawasaki Z900 2017. It takes less time to sell a Yamaha MT-09 with 52 days compared to 85 days for a Kawasaki Z900. Since model year 2013 1000PS.de editors have written 57 reviews for the Yamaha MT-09 and 46 reviews for the Kawasaki Z900 since model year 2017. The first review for the Yamaha MT-09 was published on 10/06/2013 and now has more than 39,900 views. This compares to more than 93,200 views for the first review on Kawasaki Z900 published on 11/11/2016.

Price Yamaha MT-09

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Kawasaki Z900

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons