Magazine
Brands
Top Awards
Compare
About us
Home
Brands
Yamaha
WR450F
Kreidler RMC-E 50 DD Sport 2009 vs. Piaggio Fly 50 2T 2010
Kreidler RMC-E 50 DD Sport 2009
Piaggio Fly 50 2T 2010
Loading...
Technical Specifications Kreidler RMC-E 50 DD Sport 2009 compared to Piaggio Fly 50 2T 2010
Kreidler RMC-E 50 DD Sport 2009
Piaggio Fly 50 2T 2010
Show all
Same only
Differences
Kreidler RMC-E 50 DD Sport 2009
Piaggio Fly 50 2T 2010
Engine and Drive Train
Engine power
Engine power
4 HP
Engine power
3.6 HP
Transmission Type
Transmission Type
Variomatic
Transmission Type
Automatic
Displacement
Displacement
49 ccm
Displacement
50 ccm
Brakes Rear
Type
Type
Drum
Type
Drum
Dimensions and Weights
Front tyre diameter
Front tyre diameter
12 inch
Front tyre diameter
12 inch
Rear tyre diameter
Rear tyre diameter
12 inch
Rear tyre diameter
12 inch
Seat Height
Seat Height
770 mm
Seat Height
785 mm
Dry Weight
Dry Weight
239 kg
Dry Weight
111 kg
Fuel Tank Capacity
Fuel Tank Capacity
5.8 l
Fuel Tank Capacity
7.6 l
License compliancy
License compliancy
AM
License compliancy
AM
Alternative Comparisons
VS.
Kreidler RMC-E 50 2009 vs
Kreidler RMC-E 50 DD Sport 2010
VS.
Piaggio Fly 50 2T 2017 vs
Piaggio NRG Power 50 DD 2T 2018
VS.
Kymco Like 50 2012 vs
Piaggio Fly 50 2T 2014
VS.
Piaggio ZIP 50 2021 vs
Piaggio Fly 50 2T 2009
VS.
Piaggio Fly 125 2012 vs
Piaggio Fly 50 2T 2015
VS.
Kreidler RMC-G 50 Race 2009 vs
Kreidler RMC-E 50 DD Sport 2010
VS.
Piaggio Fly 50 2T 2009 vs
Piaggio NRG Power 50 DD 2T 2020
VS.
Piaggio Fly 50 2T 2017 vs
Sym Orbit II 50 2T 2016
VS.
Kymco Like 50 2014 vs
Piaggio Fly 50 2T 2009
VS.
Piaggio Fly 50 2T 2017 vs
Peugeot Speedfight 3 50 RS Luft 2013
VS.
Piaggio Fly 50 2T 2009 vs
Gilera Runner 50 2T SP 2014
VS.
Piaggio Fly 50 2T 2016 vs
Vespa Primavera 50 2T 2017
VS.
Piaggio Fly 50 2T 2017 vs
Sym Fiddle III 50 2015