Yamaha MT-09 2023 vs. Suzuki GSX-S1000 2023

Yamaha MT-09 2023

Suzuki GSX-S1000 2023
Overview - Yamaha MT-09 2023 vs Suzuki GSX-S1000 2023
The Yamaha MT-09 2023 and the Suzuki GSX-S1000 2023 are both naked bikes that offer powerful performance and advanced features. However, there are several key differences between the two models.
In terms of engine power, the Suzuki GSX-S1000 takes the lead with 152 HP compared to the Yamaha MT-09's 119 HP. The Suzuki also has a higher torque of 106 Nm, while the Yamaha offers 93 Nm. This means that the Suzuki provides a more exhilarating and responsive riding experience, especially in terms of acceleration and top speed.
Both bikes feature in-line engines with liquid cooling and fuel injection systems, ensuring efficient and reliable performance. The Yamaha has a slightly smaller engine displacement of 889 ccm compared to the Suzuki's 999 ccm. However, this difference may not be noticeable in everyday riding situations.
In terms of suspension, both bikes feature upside-down telescopic forks at the front and swing arm suspensions at the rear. The shock absorbers are also monoshocks, providing a smooth and comfortable ride. The chassis of both bikes is made of aluminum and features a twin tube frame, ensuring stability and agility on the road.

Yamaha MT-09 2023
When it comes to braking, both bikes are equipped with double disk brakes at the front. However, the Suzuki has a larger brake diameter of 310 mm compared to the Yamaha's 298 mm. This means that the Suzuki offers better stopping power and control.
In terms of advanced rider assistance systems, both bikes feature ABS and traction control. However, the Yamaha MT-09 goes a step further by offering a quickshifter, which allows for seamless gear shifts without the need for clutch operation. The Suzuki GSX-S1000, on the other hand, offers additional features such as riding modes, ride by wire, and a shift assistant with blipper. These features enhance the overall riding experience and provide more customization options.
In terms of dimensions and weights, the Suzuki GSX-S1000 has a slightly longer wheelbase of 1460 mm compared to the Yamaha MT-09's 1430 mm. The seat height of the Suzuki is also slightly lower at 810 mm compared to the Yamaha's 825 mm. However, the Yamaha is lighter with a kerb weight of 189 kg, while the Suzuki weighs 214 kg.

Suzuki GSX-S1000 2023
Both bikes have different fuel tank capacities, with the Yamaha MT-09 offering 14 liters and the Suzuki GSX-S1000 offering 19 liters. This means that the Suzuki has a longer range of 311 km compared to the Yamaha's 280 km. However, the Yamaha has a lower combined fuel consumption of 5 l/100km compared to the Suzuki's 6.1 l/100km.
In terms of strengths, the Yamaha MT-09 offers a comfortable seating position, a successful chassis, and lively handling, providing enormous riding pleasure. The Suzuki GSX-S1000, on the other hand, boasts a superior engine, excellent shift assistant with blipper, balanced handling, and a bold design. It also offers a more driving-friendly seating position and comes at a good price.
However, both bikes have their weaknesses. The Yamaha MT-09 has polarizing optics and a small TFT display. It also has a somewhat indirect front wheel feel and cruise control is only available in the SP variant. The Suzuki GSX-S1000, on the other hand, has a less comprehensive electronics package with no 6-axis IMU or cornering ABS. The instruments on the handlebars are somewhat antiquated, and the display is not particularly easy to read.
In conclusion, both the Yamaha MT-09 2023 and the Suzuki GSX-S1000 2023 are powerful naked bikes with their own strengths and weaknesses. The Yamaha offers a comfortable and enjoyable riding experience, while the Suzuki provides a more exhilarating performance and advanced features. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.
Technical Specifications Yamaha MT-09 2023 compared to Suzuki GSX-S1000 2023
Pros and Cons in comparison
Pros and Cons in comparison
Yamaha MT-09 2023

If you take a look at the key data of the MT-09, including its over-complete standard equipment, "mid-range naked bike" almost sounds a little pejorative. The Japanese engineers have made improvements exactly where they were needed. The swaying chassis is now a thing of the past and the load change reactions have also been eliminated from the revised three-cylinder engine. The additional power paired with a little more pressure in the mid-range gives a sovereign riding feeling. The MT-09 offers a lot of equipment and enormous riding pleasure at a very attractive price.
Suzuki GSX-S1000 2023

The new GSX-S1000 is an old acquaintance in terms of basic design - the engine and chassis are still from the predecessor. However, the machine has been modernised in many areas and presents itself at an extremely high level, especially visually. Although the engine cannot compete in the league of the super-potent Hyper Nakeds, it functions very harmoniously and powerfully enough. The conventional chassis also strikes a successful compromise between sportiness and comfort. The hammer arguments are definitely the successful design, the standard quickshifter with blipper and, last but not least, the comparatively low price.
Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Yamaha MT-09 vs Suzuki GSX-S1000
There are a few key differences between a Yamaha MT-09 2023 and a Suzuki GSX-S1000 2023. In terms of price, the actual average price of a Suzuki GSX-S1000 2023 is about 21% higher. Compared to Suzuki GSX-S1000 2023 there are more Yamaha MT-09 2023 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 136 compared to 73. It takes less time to sell a Yamaha MT-09 with 73 days compared to 155 days for a Suzuki GSX-S1000. Since model year 2013 1000PS.de editors have written 57 reviews for the Yamaha MT-09 and 36 reviews for the Suzuki GSX-S1000 since model year 2015. The first review for the Yamaha MT-09 was published on 10/06/2013 and now has more than 39,900 views. This compares to more than 17,100 views for the first review on Suzuki GSX-S1000 published on 27/09/2014.