BMW F 900 R 2023 vs. Kawasaki Vulcan S 2015

BMW F 900 R 2023

BMW F 900 R 2023

Kawasaki Vulcan S 2015

Kawasaki Vulcan S 2015

Loading...

Overview - BMW F 900 R 2023 vs Kawasaki Vulcan S 2015

BMW F 900 R 2023

BMW F 900 R 2023

Kawasaki Vulcan S 2015

Kawasaki Vulcan S 2015

Technical Specifications BMW F 900 R 2023 compared to Kawasaki Vulcan S 2015

BMW F 900 R 2023
Kawasaki Vulcan S 2015
Show all
Same only
Differences
BMW F 900 R 2023
BMW F 900 R 2023
Kawasaki Vulcan S 2015
Kawasaki Vulcan S 2015

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore86 mmBore83 mm
StrokeStroke77 mmStroke60 mm
Engine powerEngine power105 HPEngine power61 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power8,500 rpmRpm at Max. Power7,500 rpm
TorqueTorque92 NmTorque63 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque6,500 rpmRpm at Torque6,600 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio13.1 Compression Ratio10.8
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders2Cylinders2
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement895 ccmDisplacement649 ccm

Chassis

FrameFrameSteelFrameSteel
Frame typeFrame typeTwin Tube, Load-bearing engineFrame typePerimeter

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeSingle disk
PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonDouble piston

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonSingle piston

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter18 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width180 mmRear tyre width160 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height60 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,140 mmLength2,310 mm
WidthWidth815 mmWidth880 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,518 mmWheelbase1,575 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height815 mmSeat Height705 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)211 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)228 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity13 lFuel Tank Capacity14 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

BMW F 900 R 2023

BMW F 900 R 2023

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Kawasaki Vulcan S 2015

Kawasaki Vulcan S 2015

The Vulcan S is reinvigorating the "small" mid-size cruiser scene - not only because of its unique design, but also because it is so easy to ride and is aimed at beginners. The low seat height and the narrow saddle help the rider to stand securely on the ground, while the low centre of gravity also makes for easy and safe handling. The engine also fits in well with the uncomplicated appearance, can be revved up decently from 2000 rpm and only stops at around 10,000 rpm - something that has never been seen before in a cruiser. The "Ergo-Fit" system, which varies the seat height, the rider's distance from the handlebars and the footrests, costs extra but also allows the Vulcan S owner generous customisation options.

Rev-happy engine that also behaves well in the lower rev range

decent brake with ABS

idiosyncratic look

narrow and therefore manoeuvrable 160 rear tyre

Ergo-Fit system for optimum adaptation to the rider

sufficiently comfortable chassis.

Ergo-Fit system costs extra

moderate wind protection

gear indicator only available as an option

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price BMW F 900 R vs Kawasaki Vulcan S

Price BMW F 900 R

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Kawasaki Vulcan S

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUISSchuberthMotorex AGcalimoto GmbHContinental Motorradreifen