Kawasaki Z900 2017 vs. Kawasaki Z1000 R 2017

Kawasaki Z900 2017

Kawasaki Z900 2017

Kawasaki Z1000 R 2017

Kawasaki Z1000 R 2017

Loading...

Overview - Kawasaki Z900 2017 vs Kawasaki Z1000 R 2017

The Kawasaki Z900 2017 and the Kawasaki Z1000 R 2017 are both naked bikes with similar engine types, fuel systems, and cooling systems. However, there are several differences between the two models.

In terms of engine power, the Z1000 R has a higher horsepower rating of 142 HP compared to the Z900's 125.4 HP. The Z1000 R also has a higher torque rating of 111 Nm compared to the Z900's 98.6 Nm. This means that the Z1000 R will have more power and acceleration capabilities compared to the Z900.

Both bikes have four cylinders and a liquid cooling system, ensuring efficient engine performance. The Z900 has a displacement of 948 ccm, while the Z1000 R has a displacement of 1043 ccm, indicating that the Z1000 R has a slightly larger engine.

In terms of suspension, both bikes have upside-down telescopic forks at the front and swing arm suspension at the rear. However, the Z1000 R offers more adjustment options for the front suspension, including compression, preload, and rebound, compared to the Z900's preload and rebound adjustments. This allows for more precise tuning of the suspension on the Z1000 R.

Kawasaki Z900 2017

Kawasaki Z900 2017

Both bikes have a double cradle frame, but the Z900 has a steel frame while the Z1000 R has an aluminum frame. The aluminum frame on the Z1000 R is likely to be lighter and more rigid, providing better handling and stability.

In terms of braking, both bikes have double disk brakes at the front with four pistons. However, the Z1000 R has larger diameter disks (310 mm) and features radial, monoblock, and petal technology, which may provide better braking performance compared to the Z900's 300 mm double disk brakes with petal technology.

Both bikes have similar front and rear tire dimensions, with the Z900 having a front tire width of 120 mm and a rear tire width of 180 mm, while the Z1000 R has a front tire width of 120 mm and a rear tire width of 190 mm. The Z1000 R also has a slightly shorter wheelbase of 1435 mm compared to the Z900's 1450 mm.

Kawasaki Z1000 R 2017

Kawasaki Z1000 R 2017

In terms of seat height, the Z900 has a lower seat height of 795 mm compared to the Z1000 R's 815 mm. This may make the Z900 more accessible for shorter riders.

In terms of strengths, the Z900 is praised for its ingenious naked bike chassis, superb looks, and a perfectly dimensioned torque. It is also considered to be a good balance of performance, price, and practical use. On the other hand, the Z1000 R is praised for its powerful engine and high-quality chassis, providing a stable and precise ride. It is also known for offering a real naked bike feeling without the hecticness of a supersport bike.

In terms of weaknesses, the Z900 is criticized for having a narrow knee angle for tall people, suggesting that a different seat may be needed for more comfort. The Z1000 R is noted for having a little steering angle and lacking a shift assistant.

Overall, the Z1000 R offers more power and performance compared to the Z900, with a higher horsepower and torque rating. It also has more advanced suspension adjustments and a lighter aluminum frame. However, the Z900 may be more suitable for shorter riders due to its lower seat height.

Technical Specifications Kawasaki Z900 2017 compared to Kawasaki Z1000 R 2017

Kawasaki Z900 2017
Kawasaki Z1000 R 2017
Show all
Same only
Differences
Kawasaki Z900 2017
Kawasaki Z900 2017
Kawasaki Z1000 R 2017
Kawasaki Z1000 R 2017

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore73.4 mmBore77 mm
StrokeStroke56 mmStroke56 mm
Engine powerEngine power125.4 HPEngine power142 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power9,500 rpmRpm at Max. Power10,000 rpm
TorqueTorque98.6 NmTorque111 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque7,700 rpmRpm at Torque7,300 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio11.8 Compression Ratio11.8
Fuel systemFuel systemInjectionFuel systemInjection
Throttle BoreThrottle Bore36 mmThrottle Bore38 mm
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
IgnitionIgnitionDigitalIgnitionDigital
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Transmission TypeTransmission TypeGearshiftTransmission TypeGearshift
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders4Cylinders4
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement948 ccmDisplacement1,043 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
DiameterDiameter41 mmDiameter41 mm
TravelTravel120 mmTravel120 mm
AdjustmentAdjustmentPreload, ReboundAdjustmentCompression, Preload, Rebound

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionSwing arm
Shock absorberShock absorberMonoshockShock absorberMonoshock
Shock mountShock mountDeflectionShock mountDeflection
TravelTravel140 mmTravel131 mm
AdjustmentAdjustmentPreload, ReboundAdjustmentCompression, Preload, Rebound
MaterialMaterialAluminiumMaterialAluminium

Chassis

FrameFrameSteelFrameAluminium
Frame typeFrame typeDouble cradleFrame typeDouble cradle
RakeRake65 degreeRake65.5 degree
TrailTrail105 mmTrail101 mm

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
DiameterDiameter300 mmDiameter310 mm
PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons
Shock mountShock mountFixed caliperShock mountSemi-Schwimmsattel
TechnologyTechnologyPetalTechnologyradial, Monoblock, Petal

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
DiameterDiameter250 mmDiameter250 mm
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonSingle piston

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width180 mmRear tyre width190 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height50 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,070 mmLength2,045 mm
WidthWidth820 mmWidth790 mm
HeightHeight1,065 mmHeight1,055 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,450 mmWheelbase1,435 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height795 mmSeat Height815 mm
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Kawasaki Z900 2017

Kawasaki Z900 2017

An incredibly well-designed motorbike. A lot of test work and attention to detail went into it. It has exactly the right power, exactly the right chassis and exactly the right look. An all-round successful naked bike that will make you happy for a long time. If you like, you can ride it simply and faithfully, but if you want, you can also ride it really fast and it wheels like hell. Great!

Ingenious nakedbike chassis

superb looks

engine responds super fine, revs up willingly and has a perfectly dimensioned torque

optimum intersection of performance, price and practical use

Knee angle very narrow for tall people (order another seat!)

Kawasaki Z1000 R 2017

Kawasaki Z1000 R 2017

Of course, on paper the Z1000R is inferior to current Powernakeds and in a classic points evaluation it also loses to the simply perfect Z900. BUT it still exudes pure fascination. Not everyone will like it, but some will adore it. A truly masculine man's bike with a very superior engine and a chassis from the golden era of naked bikes. The Z1000R is still a true naked bike from Supersport Gene - with all its advantages and disadvantages.

Powerful and powerful naked bike engine. Nothing here seems contrived or high-bred - pure power

high-quality and superior chassis - stable, precise and full. Not a handling rocket - Nevertheless, this is among the advantages. Real nakedbike feeling without supersport hecticness

Little steering angle

shift assistant missing

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Kawasaki Z900 vs Kawasaki Z1000 R

There are a few key differences between a Kawasaki Z900 2017 and a Kawasaki Z1000 R 2017. In terms of price, the actual average price of a Kawasaki Z1000 R 2017 is about 79% higher. A Kawasaki Z900 2017 experiences a loss of 530 GBP in one year and 930 GBP in two years of ownership. This is offset by a loss of 1,030 GBP and 3,600 GBP for a Kawasaki Z1000 R 2017. Compared to Kawasaki Z1000 R 2017 there are more Kawasaki Z900 2017 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 43 compared to 4. It takes less time to sell a Kawasaki Z900 with 85 days compared to 173 days for a Kawasaki Z1000 R. Since model year 2017 1000PS.de editors have written 46 reviews for the Kawasaki Z900 and 2 reviews for the Kawasaki Z1000 R since model year 2017. The first review for the Kawasaki Z900 was published on 11/11/2016 and now has more than 93,200 views. This compares to more than 46,400 views for the first review on Kawasaki Z1000 R published on 02/06/2017.

Price Kawasaki Z900

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Kawasaki Z1000 R

Unfortunately, the data available to us is not sufficient to provide meaningful price information for this model.

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUISMotorex AGSchuberthContinental Motorradreifencalimoto GmbH