BMW F 700 GS 2018 vs. Triumph Tiger Sport 2014

BMW F 700 GS 2018

BMW F 700 GS 2018

Triumph Tiger Sport 2014

Triumph Tiger Sport 2014

Loading...

Overview - BMW F 700 GS 2018 vs Triumph Tiger Sport 2014

BMW F 700 GS 2018

BMW F 700 GS 2018

Triumph Tiger Sport 2014

Triumph Tiger Sport 2014

Technical Specifications BMW F 700 GS 2018 compared to Triumph Tiger Sport 2014

BMW F 700 GS 2018
Triumph Tiger Sport 2014

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore82 mmBore79 mm
StrokeStroke75.6 mmStroke71.4 mm
Engine powerEngine power75 HPEngine power125 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power7,000 rpmRpm at Max. Power9,400 rpm
TorqueTorque77 NmTorque104 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque5,500 rpmRpm at Torque4,300 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12 Compression Ratio12
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders2Cylinders3
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesDOHC
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement798 ccmDisplacement1,050 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionTelescopic fork

Chassis

Frame typeFrame typeTubular, Load-bearing engineFrame typeTwin Tube

Brakes Front

PistonPistonDouble pistonPistonFour pistons

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonDouble piston
Shock mountShock mountFloating caliperShock mountFloating caliper

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width110 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height80 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter19 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width140 mmRear tyre width180 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height80 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,280 mmLength2,150 mm
WidthWidth855 mmWidth835 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,557 mmWheelbase1,540 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height820 mmSeat Height830 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity16 lFuel Tank Capacity20 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

BMW F 700 GS 2018

BMW F 700 GS 2018

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Triumph Tiger Sport 2014

Triumph Tiger Sport 2014

In direct comparison with its little sister, the Tiger 800 XC, the Tiger Sport 1050 can only score in one area: The brakes are extremely well-balanced and apply properly when you need them. In most other disciplines, however, it cannot prevail. Especially in handling, the big 1050 is much more stubborn than its little sister. Since it can't really be used off-road, its radius of action is much narrower than that of the Tiger 800 XC. However, if you are looking for a universal partner for the road, which, in addition to a comfortable riding position, should also offer a certain amount of sport, the Tiger Sport 1050 is certainly not the wrong choice.

Sporty and distinctive design

powerful three-cylinder engine

good sound

comfortable seating position

excellent brakes

stable chassis.

Stubborn handling in tight corners

not suitable for off-road use

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price BMW F 700 GS vs Triumph Tiger Sport

Price BMW F 700 GS

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Triumph Tiger Sport

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH