KTM 390 Duke 2015 vs. BMW G 310 R 2017

KTM 390 Duke 2015

KTM 390 Duke 2015

BMW G 310 R 2017

BMW G 310 R 2017

Loading...

Overview - KTM 390 Duke 2015 vs BMW G 310 R 2017

The KTM 390 Duke 2015 and the BMW G 310 R 2017 are both popular naked bikes in their respective model years. While they share some similarities in terms of specifications, they also have distinct differences that set them apart.

In terms of engine power, the KTM 390 Duke 2015 has a slight advantage with 44 HP compared to the BMW G 310 R 2017's 34 HP. This translates to a more powerful and exhilarating riding experience on the KTM. However, the BMW compensates for this with its smooth response, providing a more refined and controlled ride.

Both bikes have a single-cylinder engine with a displacement of around 300cc. The KTM has a slightly larger displacement at 373.2cc compared to the BMW's 313cc. This means that the KTM may have a slight edge in terms of overall performance and acceleration.

KTM 390 Duke 2015

KTM 390 Duke 2015

In terms of suspension, both bikes feature upside-down telescopic forks at the front, providing good stability and handling. The KTM has a Chromium-molybdenum frame, which is known for its strength and durability. On the other hand, the BMW has a steel frame, which may not be as robust as the KTM's frame.

Both bikes have single disk brakes at the front, ensuring reliable stopping power. The dimensions and weights of the two bikes are quite similar, with both having a front tire width of 110mm and a rear tire width of 150mm. They also both have a 17-inch front and rear tire diameter. The wheelbase of the BMW is slightly longer at 1374mm compared to the KTM's 1367mm. However, the difference is minimal and may not have a significant impact on the overall handling and maneuverability of the bikes.

In terms of seat height, the BMW has a lower seat height at 785mm compared to the KTM's 800mm. This makes the BMW more accessible to riders with shorter inseams. However, taller riders may find the KTM more comfortable due to its slightly higher seat height.

BMW G 310 R 2017

BMW G 310 R 2017

One area where the KTM excels is its weight. With a kerb weight of 139kg, it is significantly lighter than the BMW, which weighs 158.5kg. This lower weight contributes to the KTM's nimble and agile handling, making it a joy to ride in urban environments and twisty roads.

In terms of design, the BMW G 310 R 2017 stands out with its sleek and modern aesthetics. It has a more refined and sophisticated look compared to the KTM, which has a more aggressive and sporty appearance. However, some riders may find that certain components on the BMW look cheap, which can be a drawback.

Overall, both the KTM 390 Duke 2015 and the BMW G 310 R 2017 have their strengths and weaknesses. The KTM offers a more powerful and performance-oriented ride, with its anti-hopping clutch and compact geometry. On the other hand, the BMW provides a smoother response and a lower seat height, making it more accessible to a wider range of riders. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.

Technical Specifications KTM 390 Duke 2015 compared to BMW G 310 R 2017

KTM 390 Duke 2015
BMW G 310 R 2017

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore89 mmBore80 mm
StrokeStroke60 mmStroke62 mm
Engine powerEngine power44 HPEngine power34 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power9,500 rpmRpm at Max. Power9,500 rpm
TorqueTorque35 NmTorque28 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque7,250 rpmRpm at Torque7,500 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12.6 Compression Ratio10.6
StarterStarterElectricStarterElectric
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement373.2 ccmDisplacement313 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork

Suspension Rear

Shock mountShock mountdirectShock mountdirect

Chassis

FrameFrameChromium-molybdenumFrameSteel
Frame typeFrame typeTubularFrame typeTubular

Brakes Front

TypeTypeSingle diskTypeSingle disk

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width110 mmFront tyre width110 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width150 mmRear tyre width150 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height60 %Rear tyre height60 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,367 mmWheelbase1,374 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height800 mmSeat Height785 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)139 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)158.5 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity11 lFuel Tank Capacity11 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyA2License compliancyA2

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

KTM 390 Duke 2015

KTM 390 Duke 2015

"I'm not a girl, not yet a woman" sang Britney Spears in an innocently erotic voice, trying to make the whole world believe she wasn't already dating Justin Timberlake fi...Well, in any case, this is a transitional phase, as the 390 Duke also describes with its essence. No longer a small Duke, but not yet a big one either, the 390 is right in the middle. You shouldn't underestimate it, but you shouldn't expect too much either. If you keep this in mind, you will have a lot of fun with it, even on a not too fast race track. (However, not too many thousands should be on the road then.) Feather-light handling like a moped, but already as strong as many a 600cc funk bike from the last 10 years.

Anti-hopping clutch

pleasant performance

compact geometry

low weight

a little tight for tall people

BMW G 310 R 2017

BMW G 310 R 2017

The BMW G 310 R scores with easy handling that should not overtax any beginner. The great responsiveness of the single cylinder makes it easy to control, and the low seat height gives a secure footing at traffic lights. For reasons of cost, savings were made in some corners, which unfortunately also becomes visible. In comparison, the workmanship is not on a par with the competition.

Smooth response

low seat height

pretty design

throaty sound

Individual components look cheap

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price KTM 390 Duke vs BMW G 310 R

There are a few key differences between a KTM 390 Duke 2015 and a BMW G 310 R 2017. It takes less time to sell a KTM 390 Duke with 58 days compared to 75 days for a BMW G 310 R. Since model year 2013 1000PS.de editors have written 33 reviews for the KTM 390 Duke and 16 reviews for the BMW G 310 R since model year 2016. The first review for the KTM 390 Duke was published on 12/11/2012 and now has more than 26,300 views. This compares to more than 28,500 views for the first review on BMW G 310 R published on 07/10/2015.

Price KTM 390 Duke

Model year
Current average market prices

Price BMW G 310 R

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH