MV Agusta Brutale 910 R 2006 vs. Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011
MV Agusta Brutale 910 R 2006
Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011
Overview - MV Agusta Brutale 910 R 2006 vs Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011
The MV Agusta Brutale 910 R 2006 and the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011 are both naked bikes that offer powerful performance and impressive design. However, they have some key differences in terms of engine specifications and overall riding experience.
Starting with the engine and drive train, the MV Agusta Brutale 910 R 2006 boasts a slightly higher engine power of 136 HP compared to the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011, which has 132 HP. The Brutale 910 R has a 4-cylinder engine, while the Speed Triple 1050 has 3 cylinders. Both bikes have liquid cooling systems, ensuring optimal engine temperature regulation. In terms of displacement, the Brutale 910 R has a smaller engine at 909 ccm, while the Speed Triple 1050 has a larger engine at 1050 ccm.
MV Agusta Brutale 910 R 2006
Moving on to dimensions and weights, the Brutale 910 R has a slightly shorter wheelbase of 1410 mm, compared to the Speed Triple 1050's 1437 mm. The seat height of the Brutale 910 R is also lower at 805 mm, while the Speed Triple 1050 has a higher seat height of 828 mm. Both bikes have decent fuel tank capacities, with the Brutale 910 R holding 19 liters and the Speed Triple 1050 holding 17.5 liters.
When it comes to strengths, the Brutale 910 R stands out with its impressive power output, optimal chassis, stability, and precision. It also features a strong braking system and a great design, making it visually appealing. On the other hand, the Speed Triple 1050 offers a controlled chassis, a hard sound that adds to the riding experience, and stability.
Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011
However, the Brutale 910 R does have some weaknesses. It comes with a high price tag, which may be a deterrent for some buyers. Additionally, due to its powerful performance, it requires skill and experience to fully master and handle the bike effectively. On the other hand, the Speed Triple 1050 has been noted to have rough gearing at times, which can disrupt the overall riding experience and the connection between the rider and the machine.
In conclusion, both the MV Agusta Brutale 910 R 2006 and the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011 offer impressive performance and design. The Brutale 910 R excels in terms of power, chassis, stability, and braking, while the Speed Triple 1050 offers a controlled chassis, a hard sound, and stability. However, the Brutale 910 R comes with a higher price tag and requires more skill to handle, while the Speed Triple 1050 may have occasional issues with rough gearing. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.
Technical Specifications MV Agusta Brutale 910 R 2006 compared to Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011
Pros and Cons in comparison
Pros and Cons in comparison
MV Agusta Brutale 910 R 2006
The name says it all. A winner for every nakedbike race, with noble parts that almost justify even this price.
Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011
Even a Super Duke is in a tight spot when the bends are not too sharp and the KTM can make full use of its radical handling and its unrivalled ability to correct the radius on naked bikes. The Speed Triple is more harmonious, patient and predictable. The Duke has to be beaten, the Triple can also be stroked.
Price Comparison Avarage Market Price MV Agusta Brutale 910 R vs Triumph Speed Triple 1050
There are a few key differences between a MV Agusta Brutale 910 R 2006 and a Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011. It takes less time to sell a MV Agusta Brutale 910 R with 73 days compared to 77 days for a Triumph Speed Triple 1050. Since model year 2006 1000PS.de editors have written 1 review for the MV Agusta Brutale 910 R and 29 reviews for the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 since model year 2005. The first review for the MV Agusta Brutale 910 R was published on 27/07/2006 and now has more than 30,600 views. This compares to more than 16,200 views for the first review on Triumph Speed Triple 1050 published on 02/10/2007.
