BMW S 1000 RR 2011 vs. Honda CBR 600 RR 2011

When comparing the BMW S 1000 RR 2011 and the Honda CBR 600 RR 2011, there are several factors to consider.

Starting with the technical specifications, both motorcycles have an inline engine type, which is known for its high performance. However, the BMW S 1000 RR has a larger bore of 80mm compared to the Honda CBR 600 RR's 67mm. This means that the BMW has a larger cylinder diameter, allowing for more air and fuel mixture, resulting in increased power. The stroke of the BMW is also longer at 49.7mm compared to the Honda's 42.5mm, which means the BMW's piston travels a greater distance in each stroke, further contributing to its power output.

In terms of engine power, the BMW S 1000 RR boasts an impressive 192 HP, while the Honda CBR 600 RR has 120 HP. This significant difference in power output makes the BMW a more powerful and faster motorcycle. Additionally, the BMW has a higher torque of 112 Nm compared to the Honda's 66 Nm, which means it has more pulling power and can accelerate more quickly.

The compression ratio of the BMW is 13, indicating that the air-fuel mixture is compressed more tightly, resulting in a more efficient combustion process and increased power. On the other hand, the Honda has a compression ratio of 12.2, which is slightly lower but still respectable.

BMW S 1000 RR 2011

In terms of suspension, both motorcycles have a telescopic fork front suspension. However, the Honda CBR 600 RR has an upside-down telescopic fork, which is known for its superior performance and handling. This gives the Honda an advantage in terms of handling and maneuverability.

Both motorcycles have an aluminum frame with a twin tube design, which provides strength and rigidity. This contributes to their overall stability and handling.

In terms of braking, both motorcycles have double disk front brakes, ensuring strong and reliable stopping power.

When it comes to dimensions and weights, the BMW S 1000 RR has a wider front tire at 120mm compared to the Honda's 120mm. The BMW also has a wider rear tire at 190mm, providing better traction and stability. The wheelbase of the BMW is longer at 1432mm compared to the Honda's 1375mm, which contributes to its stability at high speeds. Both motorcycles have the same seat height of 820mm, but the BMW has a slightly higher kerb weight of 204kg compared to the Honda's 184kg.

In terms of fuel tank capacity, the Honda CBR 600 RR has a slightly larger tank at 18 liters compared to the BMW's 17.5 liters.

Honda CBR 600 RR 2011

Moving on to the strengths and weaknesses of each motorcycle, the BMW S 1000 RR has several strengths. It has improved driveability with an optimized torque curve, providing a smoother and more controlled power delivery. The BMW also has plenty of power with its 192 HP engine, allowing for exhilarating acceleration. The engine is strong and reliable, and the traction point is well-designed, providing excellent grip and stability. Additionally, the BMW features a shift assist that functions flawlessly, allowing for quick and seamless gear changes.

On the other hand, the Honda CBR 600 RR has its own strengths. It has an incredibly low dry weight, making it nimble and agile on the road. The Honda is also the first sport motorcycle to feature ABS, providing enhanced safety and braking performance. The handling of the Honda is razor-sharp, allowing for precise and responsive maneuvering.

In terms of weaknesses, the BMW S 1000 RR has been noted to have a fatiguing accelerating load, which may be a drawback for some riders. On the other hand, the Honda CBR 600 RR has weaknesses in the low rev range, meaning it may not perform as well at lower speeds. Additionally, the sporty seating position of the Honda can be extremely uncomfortable for longer rides.

In conclusion, the BMW S 1000 RR 2011 and the Honda CBR 600 RR 2011 are both powerful and high-performance motorcycles. The BMW has a significant advantage in terms of power and torque, making it a faster and more exhilarating ride. However, the Honda offers a lighter weight and superior handling, making it more agile and maneuverable. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.