Yamaha SR 400 2016 vs. Yamaha MT-03 2017

Yamaha SR 400 2016

Yamaha SR 400 2016

Yamaha MT-03 2017

Yamaha MT-03 2017

Loading...

Technical Specifications Yamaha SR 400 2016 compared to Yamaha MT-03 2017

Yamaha SR 400 2016
Yamaha MT-03 2017

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore87 mmBore68 mm
StrokeStroke67.2 mmStroke44.1 mm
Engine powerEngine power23 HPEngine power42 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power6,500 rpmRpm at Max. Power10,750 rpm
TorqueTorque27.4 NmTorque29.6 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque3,000 rpmRpm at Torque9,000 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio8.5 Compression Ratio11.2
StarterStarterKickStarterElectric
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears5Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders2
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder2Valves per cylinder4
CoolingCoolingAirCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement399 ccmDisplacement321 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionTelescopic forkFront suspensionTelescopic fork

Suspension Rear

Shock absorberShock absorberDual ShockShock absorberMonoshock

Chassis

FrameFrameSteelFrameSteel
Frame typeFrame typeDouble cradleFrame typeTwin Tube

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeSingle disk

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDrumTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width90 mmFront tyre width110 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height100 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter18 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width110 mmRear tyre width140 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height90 %Rear tyre height70 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter18 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,085 mmLength2,090 mm
WidthWidth750 mmWidth745 mm
HeightHeight1,095 mmHeight1,035 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,410 mmWheelbase1,380 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height785 mmSeat Height780 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity12 lFuel Tank Capacity14 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyA2License compliancyA2

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Yamaha SR 400 2016

Yamaha SR 400 2016

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Yamaha MT-03 2017

Yamaha MT-03 2017

The MT-03 remains Yamaha's most accessible and pragmatic Hyper Naked in the segment. It scores with its low seat height, the easily controllable power of the two-cylinder and at the same time offers enough comfort for commuters. What it may lack in sportiness, it makes up for in comfort, making it perfect for people looking for a well-functioning motorbike with a brutal look. However, you shouldn't be too big, and you shouldn't aspire to keep up with the other models in the MT range at the angle - because that's not what it was designed for. The 2020 model year is thus a coherent update that is sure to make its buyers happy.

Well controllable power

Low seat height

Easy to ride

Low consumption

Easy to read LC display

Aggressive look

Sharp knee angle for tall people

Soft chassis compared to other Yamaha MT models

Not the most emotional motorbike

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Yamaha SR 400 vs Yamaha MT-03

Price Yamaha SR 400

Unfortunately, the data available to us is not sufficient to provide meaningful price information for this model.

Price Yamaha MT-03

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH