Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 2020 vs. Husqvarna Vitpilen 401 2020

Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 2020

Husqvarna Vitpilen 401 2020
Loading...
Overview - Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 2020 vs Husqvarna Vitpilen 401 2020

Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 2020

Husqvarna Vitpilen 401 2020
Technical Specifications Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 2020 compared to Husqvarna Vitpilen 401 2020
Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 2020
Husqvarna Vitpilen 401 2020
Engine and Drive Train
Bore | Bore | 78 mm | Bore | 89 mm |
---|---|---|---|---|
Stroke | Stroke | 67.8 mm | Stroke | 60 mm |
Engine power | Engine power | 47 HP | Engine power | 44 HP |
Rpm at Max. Power | Rpm at Max. Power | 7,100 rpm | Rpm at Max. Power | 9,500 rpm |
Torque | Torque | 52 Nm | Torque | 35 Nm |
Rpm at Torque | Rpm at Torque | 4,000 rpm | Rpm at Torque | 7,250 rpm |
Compression Ratio | Compression Ratio | 9.5 | Compression Ratio | 12.6 |
Fuel system | Fuel system | Injection | Fuel system | Injection |
Starter | Starter | Electric, Kick | Starter | Electric |
Clutch Type | Clutch Type | Multiplate in oil-bath | Clutch Type | Multiplate in oil-bath |
Transmission | Transmission | Chain | Transmission | Chain |
Transmission Type | Transmission Type | Gearshift | Transmission Type | Gearshift |
Number of gears | Number of gears | 6 | Number of gears | 6 |
Cylinders | Cylinders | 2 | Cylinders | 1 |
Strokes | Strokes | 4-Stroke | Strokes | 4-Stroke |
Valves | Valves | OHV | Valves | DOHC |
Cooling | Cooling | Oil-air | Cooling | liquid |
Displacement | Displacement | 648 ccm | Displacement | 373.2 ccm |
Suspension Front
Front suspension | Front suspension | Telescopic fork | Front suspension | Upside-Down telescopic fork |
---|---|---|---|---|
Travel | Travel | 110 mm | Travel | 142 mm |
Suspension Rear
Suspension | Suspension | Swing arm | Suspension | Swing arm |
---|---|---|---|---|
Shock absorber | Shock absorber | Dual Shock | Shock absorber | Monoshock |
Material | Material | Steel | Material | Aluminium |
Chassis
Frame type | Frame type | Load-bearing engine | Frame type | Tubular |
---|
Brakes Front
Type | Type | Single disk | Type | Single disk |
---|---|---|---|---|
Diameter | Diameter | 320 mm | Diameter | 320 mm |
Piston | Piston | Double piston | Piston | Four pistons |
Brakes Rear
Type | Type | Disc | Type | Disc |
---|---|---|---|---|
Diameter | Diameter | 240 mm | Diameter | 230 mm |
Dimensions and Weights
Front tyre width | Front tyre width | 100 mm | Front tyre width | 110 mm |
---|---|---|---|---|
Front tyre height | Front tyre height | 90 % | Front tyre height | 70 % |
Front tyre diameter | Front tyre diameter | 18 inch | Front tyre diameter | 17 inch |
Rear tyre width | Rear tyre width | 130 mm | Rear tyre width | 150 mm |
Rear tyre height | Rear tyre height | 70 % | Rear tyre height | 60 % |
Rear tyre diameter | Rear tyre diameter | 18 inch | Rear tyre diameter | 17 inch |
Wheelbase | Wheelbase | 1,400 mm | Wheelbase | 1,367 mm |
Seat Height | Seat Height | 790 mm | Seat Height | 835 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | Fuel Tank Capacity | 12.5 l | Fuel Tank Capacity | 9.5 l |
License compliancy | License compliancy | A2 | License compliancy | A2 |
Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 vs Husqvarna Vitpilen 401
Price Royal Enfield Continental GT 650
Model year
Current average market prices
Price Husqvarna Vitpilen 401
Model year
Current average market prices