BMW S 1000 R 2016 vs. Suzuki GSX-R 1000 2009

BMW S 1000 R 2016

BMW S 1000 R 2016

Suzuki GSX-R 1000 2009

Suzuki GSX-R 1000 2009

Loading...

Overview - BMW S 1000 R 2016 vs Suzuki GSX-R 1000 2009

BMW S 1000 R 2016

BMW S 1000 R 2016

Suzuki GSX-R 1000 2009

Suzuki GSX-R 1000 2009

Technical Specifications BMW S 1000 R 2016 compared to Suzuki GSX-R 1000 2009

BMW S 1000 R 2016
Suzuki GSX-R 1000 2009

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore80 mmBore74.5 mm
StrokeStroke49.7 mmStroke57.3 mm
Engine powerEngine power160 HPEngine power136 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power11,000 rpmRpm at Max. Power12,000 rpm
TorqueTorque112 NmTorque116.7 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque9,250 rpmRpm at Torque10,000 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12 Compression Ratio12.8
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders4Cylinders4
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement999 ccmDisplacement999 ccm

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameAluminium
Frame typeFrame typeTwin TubeFrame typeTwin-Spar

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons
TechnologyTechnologyradialTechnologyradial

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonDouble piston

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width190 mmRear tyre width190 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height50 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,057 mmLength2,045 mm
WidthWidth845 mmWidth710 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,439 mmWheelbase1,405 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height814 mmSeat Height810 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity17.5 lFuel Tank Capacity17.5 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

BMW S 1000 R 2016

BMW S 1000 R 2016

With the BMW S 1000 R, you notice both the close relationship to the S 1000 RR superbike and the endeavour to equip the machine with a high degree of comfort for country roads and everyday use. Accordingly, the 1000cc four-cylinder power unit is brute and yet easily controllable, and the seating position is correspondingly sporty and comfortable. The fact that the S 1000 R is one of the most affordable power naked bikes is surprising and very pleasing, although one must not get hold of the list of optional extras - because thanks to the many irresistible features, it will certainly be more expensive.

Powerful and well controllable engine

powerful braking system

comfortable seating position

irresistible but expensive optional extras

hard chassis

Suzuki GSX-R 1000 2009

Suzuki GSX-R 1000 2009

The GSX-R 1000 remains something for the experienced rider, despite its precise and balanced rideability and controllable power delivery. Suzuki knows that a thousand must remain a thousand and strictly adheres to this. Let's hope that they can continue to do so for a long time.

Improved geometry

compact engine design

relaxed seating position

system with multiple height adjustments

anti-hopping clutch.

Accessibility of compression adjustment suboptimal

weak in the lower rev range

not for beginners

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price BMW S 1000 R vs Suzuki GSX-R 1000

Price BMW S 1000 R

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Suzuki GSX-R 1000

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons