KTM 690 Duke 2008 vs. Honda CB500F 2013

KTM 690 Duke 2008

KTM 690 Duke 2008

Honda CB500F 2013

Honda CB500F 2013

Loading...

Overview - KTM 690 Duke 2008 vs Honda CB500F 2013

When comparing the KTM 690 Duke 2008 and the Honda CB500F 2013, it is important to consider their technical specifications and strengths and weaknesses.

In terms of engine power, the KTM 690 Duke 2008 has a more powerful engine with 65 HP compared to the Honda CB500F 2013's 48 HP. Additionally, the KTM 690 Duke 2008 has a single-cylinder engine, while the Honda CB500F 2013 has a two-cylinder engine. This difference in engine configuration may result in varying levels of smoothness and power delivery.

Both bikes have liquid cooling systems, which help to maintain optimal engine temperatures during operation. This can be beneficial for overall performance and longevity of the engine.

In terms of displacement, the KTM 690 Duke 2008 has a larger engine with a displacement of 654ccm, while the Honda CB500F 2013 has a smaller engine with a displacement of 471ccm. The larger displacement of the KTM 690 Duke 2008 may result in more torque and overall power.

KTM 690 Duke 2008

KTM 690 Duke 2008

When it comes to dimensions and weights, the KTM 690 Duke 2008 has a longer wheelbase of 1472mm compared to the Honda CB500F 2013's 1410mm. This longer wheelbase may contribute to better stability and handling at higher speeds. However, the Honda CB500F 2013 has a lower seat height of 790mm, which may make it more accessible and comfortable for shorter riders.

In terms of fuel tank capacity, the Honda CB500F 2013 has a larger capacity of 15.7 liters compared to the KTM 690 Duke 2008's 13.5 liters. This larger fuel tank capacity may result in longer riding range before needing to refuel.

Moving on to strengths, the KTM 690 Duke 2008 boasts a stable frame, relatively low overall weight, good chassis, high-quality components, a strong braking system, and excellent handling. These attributes make it a suitable choice for riders who prioritize performance and agility.

Honda CB500F 2013

Honda CB500F 2013

On the other hand, the Honda CB500F 2013 is praised for its relatively low overall weight, agile and nimble handling, acceptable chassis, good comfort, strong engine, and successful seating position. These qualities make it a versatile and enjoyable bike for various riding conditions.

However, the KTM 690 Duke 2008 does have some weaknesses. Its single-cylinder engine is significantly weaker compared to the Honda CB500F 2013's two-cylinder engine. Additionally, the KTM 690 Duke 2008 may offer slightly less comfort and power compared to its counterpart.

The Honda CB500F 2013, on the other hand, has a few weaknesses of its own. Some riders have reported shoddy workmanship in certain areas, which may affect the overall durability and reliability of the bike. Additionally, the lack of a gear indicator may be inconvenient for riders who prefer to have this information readily available.

In conclusion, the KTM 690 Duke 2008 and the Honda CB500F 2013 have their own unique strengths and weaknesses. The KTM 690 Duke 2008 offers a more powerful engine and high-quality components, while the Honda CB500F 2013 boasts agility, comfort, and a strong engine. Ultimately, the choice between these two bikes will depend on the rider's specific preferences and priorities.

Technical Specifications KTM 690 Duke 2008 compared to Honda CB500F 2013

KTM 690 Duke 2008
Honda CB500F 2013

Engine and Drive Train

Engine powerEngine power65 HPEngine power48 HP
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders2
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement654 ccmDisplacement471 ccm

Dimensions and Weights

WheelbaseWheelbase1,472 mmWheelbase1,410 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height865 mmSeat Height790 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity13.5 lFuel Tank Capacity15.7 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA2

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

KTM 690 Duke 2008

KTM 690 Duke 2008

Are there so many people who don't need 100 hp to stabilise their ego? I think with previous single-cylinder models, it was always the design that was the problem, not the lack of power. The Duke manages to look really high-quality even as a small single-cylinder.

Stable frame

relatively low overall weight

good chassis

high-quality components

strong braking system

handling.

Significantly weaker single-cylinder engine

somewhat less comfort

somewhat less power.

Honda CB500F 2013

Honda CB500F 2013

However, such minor details cannot tarnish the good image of the Honda CB500F. After the first few metres, there was no question that it would be an excellent choice as an entry-level motorbike. But the fact that it can also meet higher demands is a little surprising, especially the engine pleases with its agile response and pronounced revving pleasure.

Relatively low overall weight

agile

nimble handling

acceptable chassis

good comfort

strong engine

successful seating position.

Partially shoddy workmanship

lack of gear indicator.

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price KTM 690 Duke vs Honda CB500F

There are a few key differences between a KTM 690 Duke 2008 and a Honda CB500F 2013. It takes less time to sell a Honda CB500F with 54 days compared to 62 days for the KTM 690 Duke. Since model year 2008 1000PS.de editors have written 29 reviews for the KTM 690 Duke and 22 reviews for the Honda CB500F since model year 2013. The first review for the KTM 690 Duke was published on 28/09/2007 and now has more than 14,800 views. This compares to more than 18,500 views for the first review on Honda CB500F published on 10/11/2012.

Price KTM 690 Duke

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Honda CB500F

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH