Kawasaki Ninja 1000SX 2020 vs. Suzuki GSX-S1000F 2015

Kawasaki Ninja 1000SX 2020

Kawasaki Ninja 1000SX 2020

Suzuki GSX-S1000F 2015

Suzuki GSX-S1000F 2015

Loading...

Overview - Kawasaki Ninja 1000SX 2020 vs Suzuki GSX-S1000F 2015

The Kawasaki Ninja 1000SX 2020 and the Suzuki GSX-S1000F 2015 are both sport touring motorcycles with similar engine types, transmission systems, and suspension setups. However, there are several key differences between the two models.

In terms of engine power, the Kawasaki Ninja 1000SX 2020 offers 142 HP, while the Suzuki GSX-S1000F 2015 boasts a slightly higher power output of 149 HP. Both bikes have four cylinders and four-stroke engines, providing a smooth and powerful riding experience.

When it comes to torque, the Kawasaki Ninja 1000SX 2020 offers 111 Nm, while the Suzuki GSX-S1000F 2015 provides 106 Nm. While the difference in torque may not be significant, it can still affect the overall performance and acceleration of the motorcycles.

In terms of suspension, both bikes feature upside-down telescopic forks at the front and swing arm suspension at the rear. The Kawasaki Ninja 1000SX 2020 offers a slightly longer rear suspension travel of 144 mm compared to the 130 mm offered by the Suzuki GSX-S1000F 2015. This can provide a more comfortable and stable ride, especially on uneven road surfaces.

Kawasaki Ninja 1000SX 2020

Kawasaki Ninja 1000SX 2020

Both motorcycles have aluminum frames, providing a lightweight and rigid structure for improved handling and stability. The Kawasaki Ninja 1000SX 2020 features double disc brakes with a diameter of 300 mm at the front, while the Suzuki GSX-S1000F 2015 has slightly larger 310 mm front brakes. Both models utilize advanced braking technologies such as radial and monoblock calipers for enhanced stopping power.

In terms of rider assistance systems, the Kawasaki Ninja 1000SX 2020 offers a range of advanced features including ABS, riding modes, cornering ABS, ride by wire, quickshifter, and traction control. On the other hand, the Suzuki GSX-S1000F 2015 only offers ABS as an advanced rider assistance system.

In terms of dimensions and weights, the Kawasaki Ninja 1000SX 2020 has a slightly shorter wheelbase of 1440 mm compared to the 1460 mm of the Suzuki GSX-S1000F 2015. The seat height of the Kawasaki Ninja 1000SX 2020 is also slightly higher at 834.98 mm compared to the 815 mm of the Suzuki GSX-S1000F 2015. The Kawasaki Ninja 1000SX 2020 is slightly heavier with a kerb weight of 235 kg compared to the 214 kg of the Suzuki GSX-S1000F 2015. However, the Kawasaki Ninja 1000SX 2020 has a larger fuel tank capacity of 19 liters compared to the 17 liters of the Suzuki GSX-S1000F 2015.

Suzuki GSX-S1000F 2015

Suzuki GSX-S1000F 2015

In terms of strengths, the Kawasaki Ninja 1000SX 2020 offers a refined and powerful engine, balanced handling, comfortable chassis, and a sufficiently comfortable seating position. It also has a modern and attractive design, good brakes, LED lights all around, a color TFT display, and cruise control as standard.

The Suzuki GSX-S1000F 2015, on the other hand, has a top exciting engine, strong Brembo brakes, great accessories, and fine traction control.

However, the Kawasaki Ninja 1000SX 2020 does have a weakness in that its windshield can only be adjusted with both hands and without tools. In comparison, the Suzuki GSX-S1000F 2015 has weaknesses in that its ABS may not be sporty enough, the wind protection is limited, and the knee angle may be a little too acute for some riders.

Overall, both the Kawasaki Ninja 1000SX 2020 and the Suzuki GSX-S1000F 2015 are capable sport touring motorcycles with their own unique strengths and weaknesses. Riders should consider their specific preferences and requirements when choosing between the two models.

Technical Specifications Kawasaki Ninja 1000SX 2020 compared to Suzuki GSX-S1000F 2015

Kawasaki Ninja 1000SX 2020
Suzuki GSX-S1000F 2015
Show all
Same only
Differences
Kawasaki Ninja 1000SX 2020
Kawasaki Ninja 1000SX 2020
Suzuki GSX-S1000F 2015
Suzuki GSX-S1000F 2015

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore77 mmBore73.4 mm
StrokeStroke56 mmStroke59 mm
Engine powerEngine power142 HPEngine power149 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power10,000 rpmRpm at Max. Power10,000 rpm
TorqueTorque111 NmTorque106 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque8,000 rpmRpm at Torque9,500 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio11.8 Compression Ratio12.2
Fuel systemFuel systemInjectionFuel systemInjection
Throttle BoreThrottle Bore38 mmThrottle Bore44 mm
StarterStarterElectricStarterElectric
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Transmission TypeTransmission TypeGearshiftTransmission TypeGearshift
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders4Cylinders4
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesDOHC
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement1,043 ccmDisplacement999 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
DiameterDiameter41 mmDiameter43 mm
TravelTravel120 mmTravel120 mm
AdjustmentAdjustmentCompression, Preload, ReboundAdjustmentCompression, Preload, Rebound

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionSwing arm
Shock absorberShock absorberMonoshockShock absorberMonoshock
TravelTravel144 mmTravel130 mm
AdjustmentAdjustmentCompression, Preload, ReboundAdjustmentPreload, Rebound

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameAluminium

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
DiameterDiameter300 mmDiameter310 mm
PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons
TechnologyTechnologyradial, Monoblock, PetalTechnologyradial

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
DiameterDiameter250 mmDiameter250 mm
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonSingle piston

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS, Riding modes, Cornering ABS, Ride by Wire, Quickshifter, Traction controlAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width190 mmRear tyre width190 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height50 %Rear tyre height50 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,100 mmLength2,115 mm
WidthWidth825 mmWidth795 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,440 mmWheelbase1,460 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height834.98 mmSeat Height815 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)235 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)214 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity19 lFuel Tank Capacity17 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Kawasaki Ninja 1000SX 2020

Kawasaki Ninja 1000SX 2020

The Kawasaki Ninja 1000SX is more evolution than revolution - but what is the point of reinventing everything in a balanced sports tourer? But the new name is definitely justified, with the many new features made possible by the Ride-by-Wire system, among others, the sports tourer is absolutely up to date. Cornering ABS, modern traction control and riding modes provide safety and adjustment options to personal preferences, the shift assistant favours sport as well as touring. What's more, the price is hot (at least in Austria)!

Refined and powerful engine

balanced handling

comfortable chassis

sufficiently comfortable seating position

modern looks

good brakes

LED lights all around

colour TFT display

cruise control standard

Windshield can be adjusted without tools but only with both hands

Suzuki GSX-S1000F 2015

Suzuki GSX-S1000F 2015

The GSX-S1000F is basically a GSX-S1000 with which it shares all the geometry, with a bit of added value that pays off quite nicely. More stability at higher speeds, more wind protection and overall more compatible with the engine's character. The GSX-R engine is still a force, even if it has run out of juice a bit down low. Suzuki also offers a great price/performance ratio here.

top exciting engine

strong brembo brakes

great accessories

fine traction control.

ABS not sporty enough

wind protection limited

knee angle a little too acute

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Kawasaki Ninja 1000SX vs Suzuki GSX-S1000F

There are a few key differences between a Kawasaki Ninja 1000SX 2020 and a Suzuki GSX-S1000F 2015. There are the same number of bikes of both models available on the 1000PS.de marketplace, specifically 10. It takes less time to sell a Kawasaki Ninja 1000SX with 83 days compared to 104 days for a Suzuki GSX-S1000F. Since model year 2020 1000PS.de editors have written 13 reviews for the Kawasaki Ninja 1000SX and 10 reviews for the Suzuki GSX-S1000F since model year 2015. The first review for the Kawasaki Ninja 1000SX was published on 05/11/2019 and now has more than 40,500 views. This compares to more than 13,100 views for the first review on Suzuki GSX-S1000F published on 30/09/2014.

Price Kawasaki Ninja 1000SX

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Suzuki GSX-S1000F

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUISMotorex AGcalimoto GmbHSchuberthContinental Motorradreifen