Husqvarna SM 125 2009 vs. SWM SM 125 R 2017

Husqvarna SM 125 2009

SWM SM 125 R 2017

Technical Specifications Husqvarna SM 125 2009 compared to SWM SM 125 R 2017

Husqvarna SM 125 2009

SWM SM 125 R 2017

Show all

Same only

Differences

Husqvarna SM 125 2009

SWM SM 125 R 2017

Engine and Drive Train

Bore	Bore	54 mm	Bore	58 mm
Stroke	Stroke	54.5 mm	Stroke	47.2 mm
Starter	Starter	Kick	Starter	Electric
Cooling	Cooling	liquid	Cooling	liquid
Displacement	Displacement	124 ccm	Displacement	124.7 ccm

Brakes Rear

Type	Type	Disc	Type	Disc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre diameter	Front tyre diameter	17 inch	Front tyre diameter	17 inch
Rear tyre diameter	Rear tyre diameter	17 inch	Rear tyre diameter	17 inch
Wheelbase	Wheelbase	1,470 mm	Wheelbase	1,485 mm
Seat Height	Seat Height	870 mm	Seat Height	913 mm
Dry Weight	Dry Weight	113 kg	Dry Weight	117 kg
Fuel Tank Capacity	Fuel Tank Capacity	9.5 l	Fuel Tank Capacity	7.2 l

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Husqvarna SM 125 2009

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

SWM SM 125 R 2017

Inexpensive 125cc with a very smart and sporty design.

Price

Optics

Brake

Chassis

Cold running behaviour: Tyres

Alternative Comparisons

VS.

SWM SM 125 R 2020 vs
KTM 125 Duke 2021

VS.

Aprilia SX 125 Supermoto 2020 vs
SWM SM 125 R 2020

VS.

SWM SM 125 R 2020 vs
SWM Ace of Spades 125 2020

VS.

SWM RS 125 R 2022 vs
SWM SM 125 R 2022

VS.

SWM RS 125 R 2020 vs
SWM SM 125 R 2020

VS.

Fantic XMF 125 Competition 2021 vs
SWM SM 125 R 2020

VS.

Aprilia SX 125 Supermoto 2022 vs
SWM SM 125 R 2022

VS.

SWM SM 500 R 2022 vs
SWM SM 125 R 2022

VS.

Online Bestia 125 ABS 2021 vs
SWM SM 125 R 2020

VS.

Husqvarna WR 125 2008 vs
Husqvarna SM 125 2009

VS.

SWM SM 125 R 2022 vs
Aprilia SX 125 Supermoto 2019

VS.

SWM SM 125 R 2023 vs
SWM RS 125 R 2023

VS.

SWM SM 125 R 2022 vs
Fantic 125M Competition 2020