Honda VFR 1200 F 2010 vs. Kawasaki ZZR 1400 2013

Honda VFR 1200 F 2010

Kawasaki ZZR 1400 2013

Overview - Honda VFR 1200 F 2010 vs Kawasaki ZZR 1400 2013

Honda VFR 1200 F 2010

Kawasaki ZZR 1400 2013

Technical Specifications Honda VFR 1200 F 2010 compared to Kawasaki ZZR 1400 2013

Honda VFR 1200 F 2010

Kawasaki ZZR 1400 2013

Honda VFR 1200 F 2010

Kawasaki ZZR 1400 2013

Suspension Front

Front suspension	Front suspension	Upside-Down telescopic fork	Front suspension	Upside-Down telescopic fork
Adjustment	Adjustment	Preload, Rebound	Adjustment	Compression, Rebound

Chassis

Frame	Frame	Aluminium	Frame	Aluminium
Frame type	Frame type	Twin Tube	Frame type	Monocoque

Brakes Front

Type	Type	Double disk	Type	Double disk
Piston	Piston	Six pistons	Piston	Four pistons

Brakes Rear

Type	Type	Disc	Type	Disc
Piston	Piston	Double piston	Piston	Double piston

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre width	Front tyre width	120 mm	Front tyre width	120 mm
Front tyre height	Front tyre height	70 %	Front tyre height	70 %
Rear tyre width	Rear tyre width	190 mm	Rear tyre width	190 mm
Rear tyre height	Rear tyre height	55 %	Rear tyre height	50 %
Length	Length	2,250 mm	Length	2,170 mm
Width	Width	755 mm	Width	770 mm
Height	Height	1,220 mm	Height	1,170 mm
Wheelbase	Wheelbase	1,545 mm	Wheelbase	1,480 mm
Seat Height	Seat Height	815 mm	Seat Height	800 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity	Fuel Tank Capacity	18.5 l	Fuel Tank Capacity	22 l
License compliancy	License compliancy	A	License compliancy	A

Pros and Cons in comparison

Honda VFR 1200 F 2010

Like the other Honda models in the test, the VFR is also convincing on the brakes and has no weaknesses when it comes to safety. It's just a shame that you have to refuel every 300 kilometres.

Mechanical dual-clutch transmission

incomparable acceleration feel

sporty driving style

sophisticated technology.

Extremely high consumption of urine.