Suzuki RM-125 2009 vs. KTM 125 SX 2013

Suzuki RM-125 2009

Suzuki RM-125 2009

KTM 125 SX 2013

KTM 125 SX 2013

Loading...

Technical Specifications Suzuki RM-125 2009 compared to KTM 125 SX 2013

Suzuki RM-125 2009
KTM 125 SX 2013

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore54 mmBore54 mm
StrokeStroke54.5 mmStroke54.5 mm
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes2-StrokeStrokes2-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement124 ccmDisplacement124.8 ccm

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width80 mmFront tyre width80 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height100 %Front tyre height100 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter21 inchFront tyre diameter21 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width100 mmRear tyre width100 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height90 %Rear tyre height90 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter19 inchRear tyre diameter19 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,450 mmWheelbase1,471 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height950 mmSeat Height985 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity8 lFuel Tank Capacity8 l

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Suzuki RM-125 2009

Suzuki RM-125 2009

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

KTM 125 SX 2013

KTM 125 SX 2013

It is the smallest and lightest (adult) KTM available. But there is much more to this little one than most would suspect.

Reasonable price

light weight

fun riding experience.

Engine characteristics need getting used to

unsteady chassis

not for those lazy about shifting gears

Price Comparison Average Market Price Suzuki RM-125 vs KTM 125 SX

Price Suzuki RM-125

Unfortunately, the data available to us is not sufficient to provide meaningful price information for this model.

Price KTM 125 SX

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons