Beta RR 350 4T 2016 vs. Husaberg FE 390 2012

Technical Specifications Beta RR 350 4T 2016 compared to Husaberg FE 390 2012

Beta RR 350 4T 2016

Husaberg FE 390 2012

Show all

Same only

Differences

Beta RR 350 4T 2016

Husaberg FE 390 2012

Engine and Drive Train

Bore	Bore	88 mm	Bore	95 mm
Stroke	Stroke	57.4 mm	Stroke	55.5 mm
Compression Ratio	Compression Ratio	12.9	Compression Ratio	11.1
Starter	Starter	Kick	Starter	Electric
Clutch Type	Clutch Type	Multiplate in oil-bath	Clutch Type	Multiplate in oil-bath
Transmission	Transmission	Chain	Transmission	Chain
Cylinders	Cylinders	1	Cylinders	1
Strokes	Strokes	4-Stroke	Strokes	4-Stroke
Displacement	Displacement	349.1 ccm	Displacement	393.3 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspension	Front suspension	Upside-Down telescopic fork	Front suspension	Upside-Down telescopic fork

Chassis

Frame type	Frame type	Double cradle	Frame type	Double cradle, Perimeter

Brakes Rear

Type	Type	Disc	Type	Disc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre width	Front tyre width	90 mm	Front tyre width	90 mm
Front tyre height	Front tyre height	90 %	Front tyre height	90 %
Front tyre diameter	Front tyre diameter	21 inch	Front tyre diameter	21 inch
Rear tyre width	Rear tyre width	140 mm	Rear tyre width	140 mm
Rear tyre height	Rear tyre height	80 %	Rear tyre height	80 %
Rear tyre diameter	Rear tyre diameter	18 inch	Rear tyre diameter	18 inch
Wheelbase	Wheelbase	1,475 mm	Wheelbase	1,475 mm
Seat Height	Seat Height	940 mm	Seat Height	985 mm
Dry Weight	Dry Weight	113 kg	Dry Weight	114 kg
Fuel Tank Capacity	Fuel Tank Capacity	8 l	Fuel Tank Capacity	8.5 l