BMW S 1000 RR 2018 vs. BMW HP4 2013

BMW S 1000 RR 2018

BMW HP4 2013
Loading...
Technical Specifications BMW S 1000 RR 2018 compared to BMW HP4 2013
BMW S 1000 RR 2018
BMW HP4 2013
Engine and Drive Train
Engine type | Engine type | In line | Engine type | In line |
---|---|---|---|---|
Bore | Bore | 80 mm | Bore | 80 mm |
Stroke | Stroke | 49.7 mm | Stroke | 49.7 mm |
Engine power | Engine power | 199 HP | Engine power | 193 HP |
Rpm at Max. Power | Rpm at Max. Power | 13,500 rpm | Rpm at Max. Power | 13,000 rpm |
Torque | Torque | 113 Nm | Torque | 112 Nm |
Rpm at Torque | Rpm at Torque | 10,500 rpm | Rpm at Torque | 9,750 rpm |
Compression Ratio | Compression Ratio | 13 | Compression Ratio | 13 |
Clutch Type | Clutch Type | Multiplate in oil-bath, Antihopping | Clutch Type | Multiplate in oil-bath, Antihopping |
Transmission | Transmission | Chain | Transmission | Chain |
Number of gears | Number of gears | 6 | Number of gears | 6 |
Cylinders | Cylinders | 4 | Cylinders | 4 |
Strokes | Strokes | 4-Stroke | Strokes | 4-Stroke |
Displacement | Displacement | 999 ccm | Displacement | 999 ccm |
Suspension Front
Front suspension | Front suspension | Upside-Down telescopic fork | Front suspension | Telescopic fork |
---|
Suspension Rear
Suspension | Suspension | Swing arm | Suspension | Swing arm |
---|
Chassis
Frame | Frame | Aluminium | Frame | Aluminium |
---|---|---|---|---|
Frame type | Frame type | Twin Tube | Frame type | Twin Tube |
Brakes Front
Type | Type | Double disk | Type | Double disk |
---|---|---|---|---|
Piston | Piston | Four pistons | Piston | Four pistons |
Technology | Technology | radial | Technology | radial, Monoblock |
Brakes Rear
Type | Type | Disc | Type | Disc |
---|---|---|---|---|
Piston | Piston | Single piston | Piston | Single piston |
Shock mount | Shock mount | Floating caliper | Shock mount | Floating caliper |
Dimensions and Weights
Front tyre width | Front tyre width | 120 mm | Front tyre width | 120 mm |
---|---|---|---|---|
Front tyre height | Front tyre height | 70 % | Front tyre height | 70 % |
Front tyre diameter | Front tyre diameter | 17 inch | Front tyre diameter | 17 inch |
Rear tyre width | Rear tyre width | 190 mm | Rear tyre width | 200 mm |
Rear tyre height | Rear tyre height | 55 % | Rear tyre height | 55 % |
Rear tyre diameter | Rear tyre diameter | 17 inch | Rear tyre diameter | 17 inch |
Length | Length | 2,050 mm | Length | 2,056 mm |
Width | Width | 826 mm | Width | 826 mm |
Wheelbase | Wheelbase | 1,438 mm | Wheelbase | 1,423 mm |
Seat Height | Seat Height | 815 mm | Seat Height | 820 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | Fuel Tank Capacity | 17.5 l | Fuel Tank Capacity | 17.5 l |
License compliancy | License compliancy | A | License compliancy | A |
Pros and Cons in comparison
Pros and Cons in comparison
BMW S 1000 RR 2018

The well-balanced universal talent will also be at the forefront of many comparison tests in 2017. It still scores with the outstanding engine and the universal and complete equipment.
On request with complete electronic equipment. All features available in high quality
Strong engine - powerful and easy to control
Comfortable seating position even for taller riders
Good chassis on the road and at trackdays
Brake fade on the racetrack under high load
Ride quality high enough for trackdays but not good enough for racing
Looks greyed out even though it is technically up to date
BMW HP4 2013

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.
Price Comparison Avarage Market Price BMW S 1000 RR vs BMW HP4
Price BMW S 1000 RR
Model year
Current average market prices
Price BMW HP4
Model year
Current average market prices