Husqvarna TE 250 2009 vs. Husqvarna TE 250 2016

Husqvarna TE 250 2009

Husqvarna TE 250 2009

Husqvarna TE 250 2016

Husqvarna TE 250 2016

Loading...

Overview - Husqvarna TE 250 2009 vs Husqvarna TE 250 2016

Husqvarna TE 250 2009

Husqvarna TE 250 2009

Husqvarna TE 250 2016

Husqvarna TE 250 2016

Technical Specifications Husqvarna TE 250 2009 compared to Husqvarna TE 250 2016

Husqvarna TE 250 2009
Husqvarna TE 250 2016

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore76 mmBore66.4 mm
StrokeStroke55 mmStroke72 mm
StarterStarterElectric, KickStarterElectric, Kick
DisplacementDisplacement250 ccmDisplacement249 ccm

Suspension Front

BrandBrandSachsBrandWP

Suspension Rear

BrandBrandSachsBrandWP

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter21 inchFront tyre diameter21 inch
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter18 inchRear tyre diameter18 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,495 mmWheelbase1,482 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height963 mmSeat Height960 mm
Dry WeightDry Weight107 kgDry Weight104.4 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity7.2 lFuel Tank Capacity11 l

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Husqvarna TE 250 2009

Husqvarna TE 250 2009

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Husqvarna TE 250 2016

Husqvarna TE 250 2016

Completely new engine for 2017! Lighter and quieter, thanks to the balancer shaft. In terms of responsiveness, the 250 moves more towards 300. The 250 also has significantly more punch in the lower rev range! The limits between 250 and 300 are now vanishingly small.

Price acquisition

price maintenance

performance

handling

unbeatable in hard terrain

I would prefer a four-stroke on smooth and easy tracks

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Husqvarna TE 250 vs Husqvarna TE 250

Price Husqvarna TE 250

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Husqvarna TE 250

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH