Can-Am Renegade 800 2009 vs. BMW S 1000 RR 2016

Can-Am Renegade 800 2009

Can-Am Renegade 800 2009

BMW S 1000 RR 2016

BMW S 1000 RR 2016

Loading...

Technical Specifications Can-Am Renegade 800 2009 compared to BMW S 1000 RR 2016

Can-Am Renegade 800 2009
BMW S 1000 RR 2016

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore91 mmBore80 mm
StrokeStroke62 mmStroke49.7 mm
TorqueTorque73 NmTorque113 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque5,500 rpmRpm at Torque10,500 rpm
DisplacementDisplacement800 ccmDisplacement999 ccm

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Seat HeightSeat Height877 mmSeat Height815 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity20 lFuel Tank Capacity17.5 l

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Can-Am Renegade 800 2009

Can-Am Renegade 800 2009

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

BMW S 1000 RR 2016

BMW S 1000 RR 2016

The well-balanced universal talent will also be at the forefront of many comparison tests in 2017. It still scores with the outstanding engine and the universal and complete equipment.

On request with complete electronic equipment. All features available in high quality

Strong engine - powerful and easy to control

Comfortable seating position even for taller riders

Good chassis on the road and at trackdays

Brake fade on the racetrack under high load

Ride quality high enough for trackdays but not good enough for racing

Looks greyed out even though it is technically up to date

Price Comparison Average Market Price Can-Am Renegade 800 vs BMW S 1000 RR

Price Can-Am Renegade 800

Unfortunately, the data available to us is not sufficient to provide meaningful price information for this model.

Price BMW S 1000 RR

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons