KTM 250 EXC 2012 vs. KTM 300 EXC 2012
KTM 250 EXC 2012
KTM 300 EXC 2012
Overview - KTM 250 EXC 2012 vs KTM 300 EXC 2012
The KTM 250 EXC 2012 and the KTM 300 EXC 2012 are both enduro motorcycles from the same manufacturer, but they have some key differences in their technical specifications and performance.
In terms of engine and drive train, the KTM 250 EXC 2012 has a bore of 66.4 mm and a stroke of 72 mm, while the KTM 300 EXC 2012 has a larger bore of 72 mm and the same stroke of 72 mm. Both bikes have a single cylinder and a displacement of 249 ccm and 293.2 ccm respectively. The KTM 250 EXC 2012 has a kick starter, while the KTM 300 EXC 2012 has both an electric and kick starter.
KTM 250 EXC 2012
Both bikes have the same front suspension, which is an upside-down telescopic fork from WP. The rear suspension is also from WP for both models. The chassis is made of steel and has a central tube frame type.
In terms of dimensions and weights, both bikes have a front tyre diameter of 21 inches and a rear tyre width of 140 mm. The rear tyre diameter is also the same at 18 inches. They have the same wheelbase of 1475 mm and seat height of 985 mm. The dry weight is slightly different, with the KTM 250 EXC 2012 weighing 103 kg and the KTM 300 EXC 2012 weighing 103.1 kg. Both bikes have a fuel tank capacity of 9.5 liters.
Now, let's compare the strengths and weaknesses of each model. The KTM 250 EXC 2012 is known for being good-natured when making mistakes at the throttle, meaning it is forgiving and easy to handle. It has an agile engine, a meticulous chassis, and an immaculate gearbox. The brakes are also of high quality. However, it can be strenuous to drive for longer distances.
KTM 300 EXC 2012
On the other hand, the KTM 300 EXC 2012 is more stable, which can be an advantage for riders who prefer a steadier ride. However, it has lower power compared to the KTM 250 EXC 2012.
In conclusion, the KTM 250 EXC 2012 and the KTM 300 EXC 2012 have similar technical specifications, but the KTM 300 EXC 2012 offers more stability while sacrificing some power compared to the KTM 250 EXC 2012. Ultimately, the choice between the two models depends on the rider's preference and intended use.
Technical Specifications KTM 250 EXC 2012 compared to KTM 300 EXC 2012
Pros and Cons in comparison
Pros and Cons in comparison
KTM 250 EXC 2012
The "big" two-stroke engine was newly developed in 2017 and is used on the 250 and 300. The electric starter is now no longer "flange-mounted" but compactly integrated. The 250 engine remains true to its line and has increased over the entire rev range. The bike offers a high degree of perfection and in expert hands is an unbeatable and indestructible winning machine. Strong enough for professionals! 300cc for the fast fraction not really necessary. Great plus in riding comfort thanks to the new balance shaft: significantly less vibration!
KTM 300 EXC 2012
The "big" two-stroke engine was newly developed in 2017 and is used on the 250 and 300. The electric starter is no longer "flange-mounted" but compactly integrated. Professionals have said that the 300 is actually too powerful for them. For me, however, it is THE 2-stroke recommendation, especially for hobby riders. With the map selector, you can choose the "mild" mapping here and also fall back on the weaker spring for the exhaust control. In practice, you can ride it in a gear higher than the 250 and it becomes quite tame. The new balancer shaft offers a big plus in ride comfort: significantly less vibration!
Price Comparison Average Market Price KTM 250 EXC vs KTM 300 EXC
There are a few key differences between a KTM 250 EXC 2012 and a KTM 300 EXC 2012. It takes less time to sell a KTM 250 EXC with 32 days compared to 41 days for a KTM 300 EXC. Since model year 2010 1000PS.de editors have written 14 reviews for the KTM 250 EXC and 15 reviews for the KTM 300 EXC since model year 2007. The first review for the KTM 250 EXC was published on 25/07/2004 and now has more than 20,600 views. This compares to more than 20,600 views for the first review on KTM 300 EXC published on 25/07/2004.
