Kawasaki ER-6n 2013 vs. KTM 690 Duke 2011

Kawasaki ER-6n 2013

Kawasaki ER-6n 2013

KTM 690 Duke 2011

KTM 690 Duke 2011

Loading...

Overview - Kawasaki ER-6n 2013 vs KTM 690 Duke 2011

Kawasaki ER-6n 2013

Kawasaki ER-6n 2013

KTM 690 Duke 2011

KTM 690 Duke 2011

Technical Specifications Kawasaki ER-6n 2013 compared to KTM 690 Duke 2011

Kawasaki ER-6n 2013
KTM 690 Duke 2011

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore83 mmBore102 mm
StrokeStroke60 mmStroke80 mm
Engine powerEngine power72 HPEngine power65 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power8,500 rpmRpm at Max. Power7,500 rpm
TorqueTorque64 NmTorque67 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque7,000 rpmRpm at Torque5,500 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio10.8 Compression Ratio11.8
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeAntihopping
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders2Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement649 ccmDisplacement654 ccm

Chassis

FrameFrameSteelFrameChromium-molybdenum
Frame typeFrame typePerimeterFrame typeTubular

Brakes Front

PistonPistonDouble pistonPistonFour pistons
Shock mountShock mountSemi-SchwimmsattelShock mountFixed caliper
TechnologyTechnologyPetalTechnologyradial

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonSingle piston
Shock mountShock mountFloating caliperShock mountFloating caliper

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width160 mmRear tyre width160 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height60 %Rear tyre height60 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,410 mmWheelbase1,472 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height805 mmSeat Height865 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity16 lFuel Tank Capacity13.5 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Kawasaki ER-6n 2013

Kawasaki ER-6n 2013

The engine is hearty and a lot of fun, plus the ER shines with a Japanese meticulous finish and a fighting price.

Solid handling

high quality level

weak brake

KTM 690 Duke 2011

KTM 690 Duke 2011

Are there so many people who don't need 100 hp to stabilise their ego? I think with previous single-cylinder models, it was always the design that was the problem, not the lack of power. The Duke manages to look really high-quality even as a small single-cylinder.

Stable frame

relatively low overall weight

good chassis

high-quality components

strong braking system

handling.

Significantly weaker single-cylinder engine

somewhat less comfort

somewhat less power.

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Kawasaki ER-6n vs KTM 690 Duke

Price Kawasaki ER-6n

Model year
Current average market prices

Price KTM 690 Duke

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH