BMW S 1000 R 2016 vs. Kawasaki Z1000 2013

BMW S 1000 R 2016

BMW S 1000 R 2016

Kawasaki Z1000 2013

Kawasaki Z1000 2013

Loading...

Overview - BMW S 1000 R 2016 vs Kawasaki Z1000 2013

The BMW S 1000 R 2016 and the Kawasaki Z1000 2013 are both naked bikes with similar engine types, in-line four cylinders. However, there are several differences between the two models.

In terms of engine power, the BMW S 1000 R 2016 comes out on top with 160 HP, while the Kawasaki Z1000 2013 offers 138 HP. This gives the BMW an advantage in terms of acceleration and top speed. The torque is also higher on the BMW, with 112 Nm compared to the Kawasaki's 110 Nm.

Both bikes feature upside-down telescopic forks for the front suspension, providing a smooth and controlled ride. The chassis of both bikes is made of aluminum, which offers a good balance between strength and weight. However, the BMW S 1000 R 2016 has a twin tube frame, while the Kawasaki Z1000 2013 has a double cradle frame. The twin tube frame on the BMW is known for its rigidity and stability, providing better handling and control.

BMW S 1000 R 2016

BMW S 1000 R 2016

In terms of braking, both bikes have double disk brakes with four pistons at the front. The BMW S 1000 R 2016 has radial technology for its front brakes, which offers better braking performance and control. The Kawasaki Z1000 2013 also has radial technology, but it also features petal brakes, which provide better heat dissipation and improved braking performance.

Both bikes have the same front and rear tire dimensions, with a width of 120 mm and a diameter of 17 inches. The wheelbase is slightly longer on the Kawasaki Z1000 2013, measuring 1440 mm compared to the BMW's 1439 mm. The seat height is also similar, with the Kawasaki measuring 815 mm and the BMW measuring 814 mm.

In terms of fuel tank capacity, the BMW S 1000 R 2016 has a larger tank with a capacity of 17.5 liters, compared to the Kawasaki Z1000 2013's 15 liters. This gives the BMW a longer range and fewer stops for refueling.

Kawasaki Z1000 2013

Kawasaki Z1000 2013

In terms of strengths, the BMW S 1000 R 2016 has a powerful and well-controllable engine, a powerful braking system, and a comfortable seating position. The Kawasaki Z1000 2013, on the other hand, has a powerful engine with a rich sound and a unique design.

However, the BMW S 1000 R 2016 does have some weaknesses, including the fact that its optional extras are expensive and hard to resist. Additionally, the chassis of the BMW is known to be hard, which can result in a less comfortable ride. The Kawasaki Z1000 2013, on the other hand, lacks traction control and has a nervous chassis, which can affect stability and handling.

In conclusion, both the BMW S 1000 R 2016 and the Kawasaki Z1000 2013 are powerful naked bikes with their own strengths and weaknesses. The BMW offers a more powerful engine, better braking performance, and a comfortable seating position, while the Kawasaki has a unique design and a rich sound. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.

Technical Specifications BMW S 1000 R 2016 compared to Kawasaki Z1000 2013

BMW S 1000 R 2016
Kawasaki Z1000 2013

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore80 mmBore77 mm
StrokeStroke49.7 mmStroke56 mm
Engine powerEngine power160 HPEngine power138 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power11,000 rpmRpm at Max. Power9,600 rpm
TorqueTorque112 NmTorque110 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque9,250 rpmRpm at Torque7,800 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12 Compression Ratio11.8
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath, AntihoppingClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders4Cylinders4
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement999 ccmDisplacement1,043 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameAluminium
Frame typeFrame typeTwin TubeFrame typeDouble cradle

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons
TechnologyTechnologyradialTechnologyradial, Petal

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonSingle piston
Shock mountShock mountFloating caliperShock mountFixed caliper

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width190 mmRear tyre width190 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height50 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,057 mmLength2,095 mm
WidthWidth845 mmWidth805 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,439 mmWheelbase1,440 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height814 mmSeat Height815 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity17.5 lFuel Tank Capacity15 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

BMW S 1000 R 2016

BMW S 1000 R 2016

With the BMW S 1000 R, you notice both the close relationship to the S 1000 RR superbike and the endeavour to equip the machine with a high degree of comfort for country roads and everyday use. Accordingly, the 1000cc four-cylinder power unit is brute and yet easily controllable, and the seating position is correspondingly sporty and comfortable. The fact that the S 1000 R is one of the most affordable power naked bikes is surprising and very pleasing, although one must not get hold of the list of optional extras - because thanks to the many irresistible features, it will certainly be more expensive.

Powerful and well controllable engine

powerful braking system

comfortable seating position

irresistible but expensive optional extras

hard chassis

Kawasaki Z1000 2013

Kawasaki Z1000 2013

All in all, the new Z1000 is a successful further development of its predecessor. The lack of traction control is more of a marketing problem than a problem for end customers.

Powerful engine

rich sound

unique design

No traction control

nervous chassis

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price BMW S 1000 R vs Kawasaki Z1000

There are a few key differences between a BMW S 1000 R 2016 and a Kawasaki Z1000 2013. In terms of price, the actual average price of a BMW S 1000 R 2016 is about 38% higher. A BMW S 1000 R 2016 experiences a loss of 390 GBP in one year and 1,960 GBP in two years of ownership. This is offset by a loss of 740 GBP and 740 GBP for a Kawasaki Z1000 2013. Compared to Kawasaki Z1000 2013 there are more BMW S 1000 R 2016 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 10 compared to 4. With 69 days it takes the same amount of time to sell a BMW S 1000 R or a Kawasaki Z1000. Since model year 2014 1000PS.de editors have written 62 reviews for the BMW S 1000 R and 41 reviews for the Kawasaki Z1000 since model year 2005. The first review for the BMW S 1000 R was published on 03/11/2013 and now has more than 17,300 views. This compares to more than 5,800 views for the first review on Kawasaki Z1000 published on 02/09/2002.

Price BMW S 1000 R

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Kawasaki Z1000

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH