Triumph Daytona 675 R 2012 vs. Honda CBR600RR 2013

Triumph Daytona 675 R 2012

Triumph Daytona 675 R 2012

Honda CBR600RR 2013

Honda CBR600RR 2013

Loading...

Overview - Triumph Daytona 675 R 2012 vs Honda CBR600RR 2013

The Triumph Daytona 675 R 2012 and the Honda CBR 600 RR 2013 are both supersport motorcycles that offer impressive performance and features.

Starting with the engine and drive train, both models have in-line engines, but the Daytona 675 R has a larger displacement of 675cc compared to the CBR 600 RR's 599cc. The Daytona also has a slightly higher engine power of 125 HP compared to the CBR's 120 HP. However, the CBR has a slightly higher torque of 66 Nm compared to the Daytona's 72 Nm. Both bikes have a DOHC valve system and 4 valves per cylinder. The Daytona 675 R has 3 cylinders, while the CBR 600 RR has 4 cylinders.

In terms of suspension, both bikes have upside-down telescopic forks at the front. The Daytona 675 R offers adjustment options for compression and rebound, while the CBR 600 RR offers additional adjustment options for preload. Both bikes have adjustable suspension at the rear for compression, rebound, and preload.

Triumph Daytona 675 R 2012

Triumph Daytona 675 R 2012

In terms of chassis, both models have a twin tube frame type, providing stability and control during high-speed riding.

When it comes to braking, both bikes have radial technology at the front, which provides improved braking performance. The Daytona 675 R has monoblock brakes, which offer even better braking power.

In terms of dimensions and weights, both bikes have the same front and rear tire width and diameter. The Daytona 675 R has a slightly longer wheelbase of 1395 mm compared to the CBR 600 RR's 1373 mm. The seat height of the Daytona is also slightly higher at 830 mm compared to the CBR's 823 mm. The CBR 600 RR has a slightly higher kerb weight of 193 kg compared to the Daytona's 185 kg. Both bikes have a decent fuel tank capacity, with the CBR 600 RR having a slightly larger capacity of 18.1 liters compared to the Daytona's 17.4 liters.

Honda CBR600RR 2013

Honda CBR600RR 2013

In terms of strengths, the Daytona 675 R offers improved damping elements, sharp handling, Öhlins suspension, ABS, a strong braking system, and an improved ride. It is also described as manageable and agile. On the other hand, the CBR 600 RR is praised for its super design, sporty look, powerful engine, pleasant ergonomics, and optimal braking system.

In terms of weaknesses, the Daytona 675 R is noted to have some minor but important adjustments that were overlooked and a relatively high purchase price. The CBR 600 RR's weakness lies in the fittings, which could have been done better in terms of appearance.

Overall, both the Triumph Daytona 675 R 2012 and the Honda CBR 600 RR 2013 are impressive supersport motorcycles with their own strengths and weaknesses. The choice between the two would depend on individual preferences and priorities.

Technical Specifications Triumph Daytona 675 R 2012 compared to Honda CBR600RR 2013

Triumph Daytona 675 R 2012
Honda CBR600RR 2013

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore74 mmBore67 mm
StrokeStroke52.3 mmStroke42.5 mm
Engine powerEngine power125 HPEngine power120 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power12,500 rpmRpm at Max. Power13,500 rpm
TorqueTorque72 NmTorque66 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque11,750 rpmRpm at Torque11,250 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12.65 Compression Ratio12.2
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders3Cylinders4
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesDOHC
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement675 ccmDisplacement599 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
AdjustmentAdjustmentCompression, ReboundAdjustmentCompression, Preload, Rebound

Suspension Rear

AdjustmentAdjustmentCompression, ReboundAdjustmentCompression, Preload, Rebound

Chassis

Frame typeFrame typeTwin TubeFrame typeTwin Tube

Brakes Front

PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons
TechnologyTechnologyradial, MonoblockTechnologyradial

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonSingle piston

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width180 mmRear tyre width180 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,020 mmLength2,029 mm
WidthWidth710 mmWidth684 mm
HeightHeight1,120 mmHeight1,115 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,395 mmWheelbase1,373 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height830 mmSeat Height823 mm
Kerb WeightKerb Weight185 kgKerb Weight193 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity17.4 lFuel Tank Capacity18.1 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Triumph Daytona 675 R 2012

Triumph Daytona 675 R 2012

The Daytona has beaten all the others before it has played its last two trump cards. The sound from the obligatory Arrow pipe, which should be worn open, is probably the coolest thing you've ever heard. Due to the additional optimal processing, simply really beautiful overall piece.

Improved damping elements

sharp handling

Öhlins suspension

ABS

strong braking system

improved ride

manageable

agile.

Some minor but important adjustments were eaten

quite high purchase price.

Honda CBR600RR 2013

Honda CBR600RR 2013

The new Honda CBR600RR divides minds above all with its idiosyncratic front - and that's a good thing, after all, this makes it perceived as completely new and different from its predecessor. That this is not the case is proven by the rest of the machine, the high-mounted rear silencer, the chassis and the engine are largely unchanged.

Super design

sporty look

powerful engine

pleasant ergonomics

optimal braking system.

The fittings could have been done better - at least in terms of appearance.

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Triumph Daytona 675 R vs Honda CBR600RR

There are a few key differences between a Triumph Daytona 675 R 2012 and a Honda CBR 600 RR 2013. It takes less time to sell a Triumph Daytona 675 R with 56 days compared to 69 days for a Honda CBR 600 RR. Since model year 2011 1000PS.de editors have written 15 reviews for the Triumph Daytona 675 R and 68 reviews for the Honda CBR 600 RR since model year 2005. The first review for the Triumph Daytona 675 R was published on 01/11/2010 and now has more than 11,000 views. This compares to more than 27,900 views for the first review on Honda CBR 600 RR published on 08/12/2004.

Price Triumph Daytona 675 R

Unfortunately, the data available to us is not sufficient to provide meaningful price information for this model.

Price Honda CBR600RR

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH