BMW S 1000 R 2016 vs. BMW M 1000 R 2023

BMW S 1000 R 2016

BMW S 1000 R 2016

BMW M 1000 R 2023

BMW M 1000 R 2023

Loading...

Overview - BMW S 1000 R 2016 vs BMW M 1000 R 2023

The BMW S 1000 R model year 2016 and the BMW M 1000 R model year 2023 are both naked bikes with similar technical specifications. They both have inline 4-cylinder engines with a displacement of 999cc. However, there are several notable differences between the two models.

In terms of engine power, the BMW S 1000 R 2016 produces 160 HP, while the BMW M 1000 R 2023 boasts a more impressive 210 HP. This significant increase in power gives the M 1000 R a clear advantage in terms of acceleration and top speed.

Both models have a torque output of around 113 Nm, with the M 1000 R having a slightly higher torque figure. This allows for strong low-end and mid-range performance, making it easier to accelerate out of corners and overtake other vehicles.

BMW S 1000 R 2016

BMW S 1000 R 2016

In terms of suspension, both models feature upside-down telescopic forks at the front and a swing arm with a monoshock at the rear. However, the M 1000 R comes with electronically adjustable suspension, allowing riders to fine-tune the suspension settings to their preferences and riding conditions. This is a significant improvement over the S 1000 R, which only has a standard suspension setup.

The chassis of both bikes is made of aluminum and features a twin-tube design. However, the M 1000 R has a load-bearing engine, which enhances the overall rigidity and stability of the bike. This results in improved handling and feedback from the chassis, giving riders more confidence in corners and at high speeds.

Both models have double disc brakes at the front with four-piston calipers and radial technology. This provides excellent stopping power and precise braking performance. The M 1000 R also comes with additional advanced rider assistance systems, including cornering ABS and launch control, further enhancing the bike's safety and performance.

In terms of dimensions and weights, the M 1000 R has a slightly longer wheelbase of 1450mm compared to the 1439mm of the S 1000 R. The seat height of the M 1000 R is also higher at 840mm compared to the 814mm of the S 1000 R. However, the M 1000 R is lighter, weighing 199kg compared to the 207kg of the S 1000 R. Both models have a fuel tank capacity of around 17 liters.

BMW M 1000 R 2023

BMW M 1000 R 2023

In terms of strengths, the S 1000 R 2016 is praised for its powerful and well-controllable engine, powerful braking system, and comfortable seating position. On the other hand, the M 1000 R 2023 is commended for its powerful and controllable motor, excellent electronics, good feedback from the chassis, stable brakes, and surprising maneuverability. It also comes with standard cruise control and heated grips, which are beneficial for country road use.

As for weaknesses, the S 1000 R 2016 is criticized for its expensive optional extras and hard chassis. On the other hand, the main weakness of the M 1000 R 2023 is its high price.

In conclusion, the BMW M 1000 R 2023 offers significant improvements over the BMW S 1000 R 2016 in terms of engine power, advanced rider assistance systems, suspension adjustability, and overall performance. However, it comes at a higher price point. Riders looking for a more powerful and technologically advanced naked bike may find the M 1000 R to be a worthy upgrade, while those on a budget may still appreciate the performance and comfort of the S 1000 R.

Technical Specifications BMW S 1000 R 2016 compared to BMW M 1000 R 2023

BMW S 1000 R 2016
BMW M 1000 R 2023
Show all
Same only
Differences
BMW S 1000 R 2016
BMW S 1000 R 2016
BMW M 1000 R 2023
BMW M 1000 R 2023

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore80 mmBore80 mm
StrokeStroke49.7 mmStroke49.7 mm
Engine powerEngine power160 HPEngine power210 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power11,000 rpmRpm at Max. Power13,750 rpm
TorqueTorque112 NmTorque113 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque9,250 rpmRpm at Torque11,000 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12 Compression Ratio13.3
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath, AntihoppingClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath, Antihopping
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders4Cylinders4
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement999 ccmDisplacement999 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
DiameterDiameter46 mmDiameter45 mm

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionSwing arm
Shock absorberShock absorberMonoshockShock absorberMonoshock

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameAluminium
Frame typeFrame typeTwin TubeFrame typeTwin Tube, Load-bearing engine

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons
TechnologyTechnologyradialTechnologyradial

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonSingle piston
Shock mountShock mountFloating caliperShock mountFloating caliper

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsDynamic suspensionAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS, Suspension electronically adjustable, Riding modes, Dynamic suspension, Cornering ABS, Launch-Control, Ride by Wire, Shift assistant with blipper, Cruise control, Traction control, Anti-wheelie

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width190 mmRear tyre width200 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,057 mmLength2,090 mm
WidthWidth845 mmWidth812 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,439 mmWheelbase1,450 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height814 mmSeat Height840 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)207 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)199 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity17.5 lFuel Tank Capacity16.5 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

BMW S 1000 R 2016

BMW S 1000 R 2016

With the BMW S 1000 R, you notice both the close relationship to the S 1000 RR superbike and the endeavour to equip the machine with a high degree of comfort for country roads and everyday use. Accordingly, the 1000cc four-cylinder power unit is brute and yet easily controllable, and the seating position is correspondingly sporty and comfortable. The fact that the S 1000 R is one of the most affordable power naked bikes is surprising and very pleasing, although one must not get hold of the list of optional extras - because thanks to the many irresistible features, it will certainly be more expensive.

Powerful and well controllable engine

powerful braking system

comfortable seating position

irresistible but expensive optional extras

hard chassis

BMW M 1000 R 2023

BMW M 1000 R 2023

The M 1000 R is definitely well done and the whole package fits. Even though it is certainly aimed more at sporty riders, the bike can also prove itself well on longer country road rides with minor restrictions in terms of riding comfort. The lower, straight handlebars and forward seating position in combination with the higher footrests automatically result in a sportier dynamic that does not give rise to couch feelings, especially on longer rides. On the other hand, there is good contact with the front wheel and sufficient lean angle freedom. In combination with the powerful drive, the Hyper Naked definitely plays in the top league. Apart from slight vibrations, the powerful RR engine is a force to be reckoned with in the naked segment. The new electronics help even less experienced riders to release the concentrated power in a controlled manner with conservative settings.

powerful and at the same time well controllable motor

great and adjustable electronics

good feedback from the chassis

stable brakes

Surprisingly manoeuvrable when desired

Standard cruise control and heated grips top for country road use

High price

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price BMW S 1000 R vs BMW M 1000 R

There are a few key differences between a BMW S 1000 R 2016 and a BMW M 1000 R 2023. In terms of price, the actual average price of a BMW M 1000 R 2023 is about 133% higher. Compared to BMW M 1000 R 2023 there are more BMW S 1000 R 2016 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 10 compared to 7. It takes less time to sell a BMW M 1000 R with 40 days compared to 69 days for the BMW S 1000 R. Since model year 2014 1000PS.de editors have written 62 reviews for the BMW S 1000 R and 6 reviews for the BMW M 1000 R since model year 2023. The first review for the BMW S 1000 R was published on 03/11/2013 and now has more than 17,300 views. This compares to more than 51,800 views for the first review on BMW M 1000 R published on 11/10/2022.

Price BMW S 1000 R

Model year
Current average market prices

Price BMW M 1000 R

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUISMotorex AGcalimoto GmbHSchuberthContinental Motorradreifen