BMW F 900 R 2020 vs. BMW S 1000 R 2016

BMW F 900 R 2020

BMW F 900 R 2020

BMW S 1000 R 2016

BMW S 1000 R 2016

Loading...

Overview - BMW F 900 R 2020 vs BMW S 1000 R 2016

The BMW F 900 R 2020 and the BMW S 1000 R 2016 are both naked bikes from BMW, but they have some notable differences in their technical specifications and strengths.

Starting with the engine and drive train, the BMW F 900 R 2020 is equipped with a 2-cylinder in-line engine with a displacement of 895cc. It produces 105 horsepower and 92 Nm of torque. On the other hand, the BMW S 1000 R 2016 features a 4-cylinder in-line engine with a displacement of 999cc. It delivers a higher power output of 160 horsepower and 112 Nm of torque. This makes the S 1000 R more powerful and provides better acceleration compared to the F 900 R.

In terms of suspension, both bikes have upside-down telescopic forks at the front and a swing arm with a monoshock at the rear. This setup ensures good stability and handling for both models. However, the BMW S 1000 R 2016 has an advantage with its dynamic suspension, which enhances the overall riding experience and comfort.

BMW F 900 R 2020

BMW F 900 R 2020

When it comes to the chassis, the BMW F 900 R 2020 has a steel frame with a twin-tube design that also acts as a load-bearing engine. On the other hand, the BMW S 1000 R 2016 features an aluminum frame with a twin-tube design. The aluminum frame provides a lighter weight and better handling compared to the steel frame of the F 900 R.

Both bikes have double disc brakes at the front with four pistons and radial technology, ensuring powerful and reliable braking performance. The BMW S 1000 R 2016 has a slight advantage with a larger rear tire width of 190mm compared to the 180mm on the F 900 R. This provides better traction and stability for the S 1000 R.

In terms of rider assistance systems, the BMW F 900 R 2020 comes equipped with ABS, anti-slipping control, and riding modes. The BMW S 1000 R 2016, on the other hand, features dynamic suspension as an advanced rider assistance system. This enhances the bike's suspension performance and adaptability to different riding conditions.

In terms of dimensions and weights, the BMW F 900 R 2020 has a wheelbase of 1518mm and a seat height of 815mm. It weighs 211kg (with ABS) and has a fuel tank capacity of 13 liters. On the other hand, the BMW S 1000 R 2016 has a slightly shorter wheelbase of 1439mm and a similar seat height of 814mm. It weighs slightly less at 207kg (with ABS) and has a larger fuel tank capacity of 17.5 liters.

BMW S 1000 R 2016

BMW S 1000 R 2016

In terms of strengths, the BMW F 900 R 2020 is praised for its easy handling, high stability, well-behaved engine, and brakes without any faults. It also offers an active yet bearable seating position and has an extensive list of accessories available. On the other hand, the BMW S 1000 R 2016 is known for its powerful and controllable engine, powerful braking system, and comfortable seating position.

However, the BMW F 900 R 2020 does have some weaknesses, such as a smaller fuel tank capacity of 13 liters and a good but not exceptional engine. On the other hand, the BMW S 1000 R 2016 has some weaknesses, including the temptation of expensive optional extras and a harder chassis.

In conclusion, while both the BMW F 900 R 2020 and the BMW S 1000 R 2016 are impressive naked bikes from BMW, they have distinct differences in terms of power, chassis, and rider assistance systems. The F 900 R offers easy handling and stability, while the S 1000 R provides a more powerful engine and a more comfortable seating position. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.

Technical Specifications BMW F 900 R 2020 compared to BMW S 1000 R 2016

BMW F 900 R 2020
BMW S 1000 R 2016

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore86 mmBore80 mm
StrokeStroke77 mmStroke49.7 mm
Engine powerEngine power105 HPEngine power160 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power8,500 rpmRpm at Max. Power11,000 rpm
TorqueTorque92 NmTorque112 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque6,500 rpmRpm at Torque9,250 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio13.1 Compression Ratio12
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath, Antihopping
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders2Cylinders4
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement895 ccmDisplacement999 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
DiameterDiameter43 mmDiameter46 mm

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionSwing arm
Shock absorberShock absorberMonoshockShock absorberMonoshock

Chassis

FrameFrameSteelFrameAluminium
Frame typeFrame typeTwin Tube, Load-bearing engineFrame typeTwin Tube

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons
TechnologyTechnologyradialTechnologyradial

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonSingle piston
Shock mountShock mountFloating caliperShock mountFloating caliper

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS, Anti-slipping control, Riding modesAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsDynamic suspension

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width180 mmRear tyre width190 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,140 mmLength2,057 mm
WidthWidth815 mmWidth845 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,518 mmWheelbase1,439 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height815 mmSeat Height814 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)211 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)207 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity13 lFuel Tank Capacity17.5 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

BMW F 900 R 2020

BMW F 900 R 2020

The BMW F 900 R offers easy-to-use cornering fun, enormously high stability, an active yet comfortable riding position and a smooth but also unemotional engine. Those who like it fast and twisty will be happy with it. The possibilities for configuration are almost endless but of course not free of charge.

easy handling, high stability

chassis with fine response

well-behaved engine

brakes without blame

active yet bearable seating position

infinitely long list of accessories.

Small tank (13l)

Good engine

BMW S 1000 R 2016

BMW S 1000 R 2016

With the BMW S 1000 R, you notice both the close relationship to the S 1000 RR superbike and the endeavour to equip the machine with a high degree of comfort for country roads and everyday use. Accordingly, the 1000cc four-cylinder power unit is brute and yet easily controllable, and the seating position is correspondingly sporty and comfortable. The fact that the S 1000 R is one of the most affordable power naked bikes is surprising and very pleasing, although one must not get hold of the list of optional extras - because thanks to the many irresistible features, it will certainly be more expensive.

Powerful and well controllable engine

powerful braking system

comfortable seating position

irresistible but expensive optional extras

hard chassis

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price BMW F 900 R vs BMW S 1000 R

There are a few key differences between a BMW F 900 R 2020 and a BMW S 1000 R 2016. In terms of price, the actual average price of a BMW S 1000 R 2016 is about 19% higher. A BMW F 900 R 2020 experiences a loss of 710 GBP in one year and 710 GBP in two years of ownership. This is offset by a loss of 390 GBP and 1,960 GBP for a BMW S 1000 R 2016. Compared to BMW S 1000 R 2016 there are more BMW F 900 R 2020 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 14 compared to 10. It takes less time to sell a BMW S 1000 R with 69 days compared to 82 days for the BMW F 900 R. Since model year 2020 1000PS.de editors have written 24 reviews for the BMW F 900 R and 62 reviews for the BMW S 1000 R since model year 2014. The first review for the BMW F 900 R was published on 05/11/2019 and now has more than 154,700 views. This compares to more than 17,300 views for the first review on BMW S 1000 R published on 03/11/2013.

Price BMW F 900 R

Model year
Current average market prices

Price BMW S 1000 R

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH