Aprilia Tuono 660 2021 vs. Yamaha MT-09 2017

Aprilia Tuono 660 2021

Aprilia Tuono 660 2021

Yamaha MT-09 2017

Yamaha MT-09 2017

Loading...

Overview - Aprilia Tuono 660 2021 vs Yamaha MT-09 2017

The Aprilia Tuono 660 2021 and the Yamaha MT-09 2017 are both naked bikes that offer sporty performance and a thrilling riding experience. However, there are some notable differences between the two models.

In terms of engine specifications, the Aprilia Tuono 660 is equipped with a 659cc in-line crankpin offset engine that produces 95 horsepower and 67 Nm of torque. On the other hand, the Yamaha MT-09 features a larger 847cc in-line engine that delivers 115 horsepower and 87.5 Nm of torque. This gives the Yamaha MT-09 a slight advantage in terms of power output.

Both bikes come with fuel injection systems and liquid cooling for optimal performance. They also feature upside-down telescopic forks for the front suspension and swing arms with monoshock absorbers for the rear suspension. The chassis of both bikes is made of aluminum, providing a lightweight and sturdy frame.

Aprilia Tuono 660 2021

Aprilia Tuono 660 2021

When it comes to braking, both bikes are equipped with double disk brakes at the front. However, the Aprilia Tuono 660 has larger 320mm diameter disks compared to the 298mm disks on the Yamaha MT-09. This gives the Aprilia Tuono 660 slightly better braking performance.

In terms of advanced rider assistance systems, both bikes come with ABS and traction control. However, the Aprilia Tuono 660 offers additional features such as riding modes, launch control, ride by wire, quickshifter, and anti-wheelie control. These features provide the rider with more control and customization options. It is worth noting that some of these features may come at an extra cost.

In terms of dimensions and weights, the Yamaha MT-09 has a longer wheelbase of 1440mm compared to the 1370mm wheelbase of the Aprilia Tuono 660. The seat height of the Yamaha MT-09 is slightly lower at 815mm compared to the 820mm seat height of the Aprilia Tuono 660. The Yamaha MT-09 also has a larger fuel tank capacity of 14 liters compared to the 15 liters of the Aprilia Tuono 660.

Yamaha MT-09 2017

Yamaha MT-09 2017

In terms of strengths, the Aprilia Tuono 660 is praised for its easy-to-operate engine with a good sound, sporty handling, good ergonomics, decent brakes, and stable and precise chassis. The Yamaha MT-09 is praised for its Öhlins suspension, Akrapovic exhaust system for improved aesthetics and sound, Magura HC3 radial brake pump for excellent braking performance, and Carbon2Race covers for a visually appealing appearance.

However, both bikes have their weaknesses. The Aprilia Tuono 660 is criticized for its price-performance ratio not being ideal and the additional cost for the IMU package. The Yamaha MT-09 requires a significant financial investment, as well as additional working time for certain parts that need to be registered. Additionally, the ECU flash on the Yamaha MT-09 is not road legal.

In conclusion, both the Aprilia Tuono 660 2021 and the Yamaha MT-09 2017 are impressive naked bikes with their own strengths and weaknesses. The Aprilia Tuono 660 offers a more extensive range of electronics and a slightly higher power output, while the Yamaha MT-09 boasts high-quality suspension components and visually appealing aftermarket accessories. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.

Technical Specifications Aprilia Tuono 660 2021 compared to Yamaha MT-09 2017

Aprilia Tuono 660 2021
Yamaha MT-09 2017

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn line crankpin offsetEngine typeIn line
BoreBore81 mmBore78 mm
StrokeStroke63.93 mmStroke59.1 mm
Engine powerEngine power95 HPEngine power115 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power10,500 rpmRpm at Max. Power10,000 rpm
TorqueTorque67 NmTorque87.5 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque8,500 rpmRpm at Torque8,500 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio13.5 Compression Ratio11.5
Fuel systemFuel systemInjectionFuel systemInjection
StarterStarterElectricStarterElectric
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath, AntihoppingClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Transmission TypeTransmission TypeGearshiftTransmission TypeGearshift
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders2Cylinders3
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesDOHC
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement659 ccmDisplacement847 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
TravelTravel120 mmTravel137 mm

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionSwing arm
Shock absorberShock absorberMonoshockShock absorberMonoshock
TravelTravel130 mmTravel130 mm

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameAluminium
Frame typeFrame typeLoad-bearing engineFrame typeTwin Tube
RakeRake65.9 degreeRake65 degree
TrailTrail104.6 mmTrail103 mm

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
DiameterDiameter320 mmDiameter298 mm

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
DiameterDiameter220 mmDiameter245 mm

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS, Riding modes, Launch-Control, Ride by Wire, Quickshifter, Traction control, Anti-wheelieAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS, Quickshifter, Traction control

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width180 mmRear tyre width180 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength1,995 mmLength2,075 mm
WidthWidth745 mmWidth815 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,370 mmWheelbase1,440 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height820 mmSeat Height815 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)183 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)193 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity15 lFuel Tank Capacity14 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyA2, ALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Aprilia Tuono 660 2021

Aprilia Tuono 660 2021

The Tuono delivers on the bends what the name promises. The sporty naked bike rides precisely and you enjoy the sporty corner chase. At the exit of the bend, however, one wishes for more emotion and adrenaline. The sporty expectation is naturally also created by the Tuono's racy appearance and cheeky demeanour. But this expectation is unfortunately not quite fulfilled in the saddle.

Easy-to-operate engine with good sound

successful appearance sporty handling

good ergonomics

decent brakes

extensive electronics - but partly at extra cost

stable and precise chassis

Price / performance ratio not right

IMU package costs extra

Yamaha MT-09 2017

Yamaha MT-09 2017

In conclusion, after several stops throughout the season, I can look back on a great result. Both in terms of performance and looks, our MT-09 is perfect. The suspension was probably our most important issue. Where before there was clearly (too much) movement in the rear in fast corners, now it is ironed over without batting an eyelid. The STX 46 shock absorber is quite stiff in its basic configuration, but also manages to get through everyday life without being uncomfortable. Thanks to generous adjustment options, there is still room for individual preferences and uses. The function of the NIX 30 cartridge is also impressive. The response behaviour - especially under load - has improved significantly. There is now also much more reserve available when braking. Where before the fork went into block and the ABS triggered when braking hard with the original set-up, now the brakes simply continue to work effectively. In addition, the MT-09 now follows the intended line in the curve radius as if by itself - a pure pleasure. The sight and sound of the Akrapovic complete system are also pure joy, and the fact that it produces a few more horsepower is felt effectively, especially in the upper third of the rev range. The front wheel shoots even more willingly into the gallery in 2nd and 3rd gear.

Öhlins suspension an extreme enrichment

thanks to Akrapovic now optics and sound are right

Magura HC3 radial brake pump works divinely

Carbon2Race covers offer grandiose optics

combination of seat, footrests and handlebar clamps very effective

Financial outlay

lots of working time

certain parts must be registered

ECU Flash not road legal

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Aprilia Tuono 660 vs Yamaha MT-09

There are a few key differences between a Aprilia Tuono 660 2021 and a Yamaha MT-09 2017. In terms of price, the actual average price of a Aprilia Tuono 660 2021 is about 24% higher. Compared to Yamaha MT-09 2017 there are more Aprilia Tuono 660 2021 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 16 compared to 10. It takes less time to sell a Yamaha MT-09 with 73 days compared to 122 days for the Aprilia Tuono 660. Since model year 2021 1000PS.de editors have written 8 reviews for the Aprilia Tuono 660 and 57 reviews for the Yamaha MT-09 since model year 2013. The first review for the Aprilia Tuono 660 was published on 05/11/2019 and now has more than 52,500 views. This compares to more than 39,900 views for the first review on Yamaha MT-09 published on 10/06/2013.

Price Aprilia Tuono 660

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Yamaha MT-09

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH