Sym Symply 50 2011 vs. Peugeot Kisbee 50 RS 2T 2013

Sym Symply 50 2011

Sym Symply 50 2011

Peugeot Kisbee 50 RS 2T 2013

Peugeot Kisbee 50 RS 2T 2013

Loading...

Overview - Sym Symply 50 2011 vs Peugeot Kisbee 50 RS 2T 2013

Sym Symply 50 2011

Sym Symply 50 2011

Peugeot Kisbee 50 RS 2T 2013

Peugeot Kisbee 50 RS 2T 2013

Technical Specifications Sym Symply 50 2011 compared to Peugeot Kisbee 50 RS 2T 2013

Sym Symply 50 2011
Peugeot Kisbee 50 RS 2T 2013
Show all
Same only
Differences
Sym Symply 50 2011
Sym Symply 50 2011
Peugeot Kisbee 50 RS 2T 2013
Peugeot Kisbee 50 RS 2T 2013

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionTelescopic forkFront suspensionTelescopic fork

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDrumTypeDrum

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width110 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter12 inchFront tyre diameter12 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width130 mmRear tyre width110 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height70 %Rear tyre height70 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter12 inchRear tyre diameter12 inch
LengthLength1,905 mmLength1,763 mm
WidthWidth690 mmWidth667 mm
HeightHeight1,125 mmHeight1,156 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity5.2 lFuel Tank Capacity6.5 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyAMLicense compliancyAM

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUISSchuberthcalimoto GmbHContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AG