Yamaha MT-09 2016 vs. Triumph Street Triple 2012

Yamaha MT-09 2016

Yamaha MT-09 2016

Triumph Street Triple 2012

Triumph Street Triple 2012

Loading...

Overview - Yamaha MT-09 2016 vs Triumph Street Triple 2012

Yamaha MT-09 2016

Yamaha MT-09 2016

Triumph Street Triple 2012

Triumph Street Triple 2012

Technical Specifications Yamaha MT-09 2016 compared to Triumph Street Triple 2012

Yamaha MT-09 2016
Triumph Street Triple 2012
Show all
Same only
Differences
Yamaha MT-09 2016
Yamaha MT-09 2016
Triumph Street Triple 2012
Triumph Street Triple 2012

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore78 mmBore74 mm
StrokeStroke59.1 mmStroke52.3 mm
Engine powerEngine power115 HPEngine power106 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power10,000 rpmRpm at Max. Power11,700 rpm
TorqueTorque87.5 NmTorque68 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque8,500 rpmRpm at Torque9,100 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio11.5 Compression Ratio12
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders3Cylinders3
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesDOHC
DisplacementDisplacement847 ccmDisplacement675 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionTelescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width180 mmRear tyre width180 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,075 mmLength2,000 mm
WidthWidth815 mmWidth735 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,440 mmWheelbase1,405 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height815 mmSeat Height800 mm
Kerb WeightKerb Weight188 kgKerb Weight189 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity14 lFuel Tank Capacity17.4 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Yamaha MT-09 2016

Yamaha MT-09 2016

The Yamaha MT-09 did not need to be reinvented for the coming season - it already was extremely well done almost four years ago. Instead, the Japanese focus on fine-tuning and adding practical, contemporary gimmicks such as traction control and automatic shifting. Due to the Euro4 standard, however, the engine management has been changed once again and offers an emphatically powerful but well controllable power delivery in standard mode; the power explosion of the first generation is now no longer offered even by the sharper A mode. The biggest change, recognisable at first glance, is the, in my opinion, extremely successful design with the more aggressive front and the newly designed rear. All in all, an even snazzier naked bike that was clearly built for the fun of motorcycling.

Wonderfully powerful three-cylinder powerplant

three power modes

fully adjustable chassis

quickshifter as standard

sporty upright seating position

good brakes

aggressive looks

traction control.

Saddle a little too hard for long tours

licence plate holder on the swingarm offers less splash protection than a conventional one

Triumph Street Triple 2012

Triumph Street Triple 2012

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Yamaha MT-09 vs Triumph Street Triple

Price Yamaha MT-09

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Triumph Street Triple

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUISContinental MotorradreifenSchuberthcalimoto GmbHMotorex AG