BMW R 1250 R 2019 vs. Yamaha XSR900 2016

BMW R 1250 R 2019

BMW R 1250 R 2019

Yamaha XSR900 2016

Yamaha XSR900 2016

Loading...

Overview - BMW R 1250 R 2019 vs Yamaha XSR900 2016

The BMW R 1250 R 2019 and the Yamaha XSR900 2016 are both naked bikes that offer a thrilling riding experience. However, they have several differences in terms of their technical specifications and strengths and weaknesses.

In terms of engine and drive train, the BMW R 1250 R 2019 is equipped with a powerful Boxer engine that produces 136 HP of power and 143 Nm of torque. On the other hand, the Yamaha XSR900 2016 features an in-line engine that generates 115 HP of power and 87.5 Nm of torque. The BMW R 1250 R has a larger displacement of 1254 ccm compared to the Yamaha XSR900's 847 ccm. The BMW R 1250 R has a liquid-air cooling system, while the Yamaha XSR900 has a liquid cooling system.

Both bikes have upside-down telescopic forks for the front suspension and monoshock for the rear suspension. However, the BMW R 1250 R has a single swing arm for the rear suspension, while the Yamaha XSR900 has a swing arm. The BMW R 1250 R has a steel frame, whereas the Yamaha XSR900 has an aluminum frame. The frame of the BMW R 1250 R is load-bearing, which adds to its stability.

BMW R 1250 R 2019

BMW R 1250 R 2019

In terms of braking, both bikes feature double disk brakes at the front. The BMW R 1250 R has larger brake disks with a diameter of 320 mm, while the Yamaha XSR900 has brake disks with a diameter of 298 mm. Both bikes are equipped with ABS as standard.

The BMW R 1250 R 2019 offers advanced rider assistance systems such as anti-slipping control, riding modes, and ride by wire. The Yamaha XSR900 2016, on the other hand, only has ABS as an advanced rider assistance system.

In terms of dimensions and weights, both bikes have the same front and rear tire widths and diameters. However, the BMW R 1250 R has a longer wheelbase of 1515 mm compared to the Yamaha XSR900's 1440 mm. The seat height of the BMW R 1250 R is also slightly higher at 820 mm compared to the Yamaha XSR900's 815 mm. The BMW R 1250 R is heavier with a kerb weight of 239 kg, while the Yamaha XSR900 weighs 191 kg. The BMW R 1250 R also has a larger fuel tank capacity of 18 liters compared to the Yamaha XSR900's 14 liters.

In terms of strengths, the BMW R 1250 R offers a powerful boxer engine with a good sound and a comfortable seating position. It also comes with ABS and traction control as standard, along with riding modes. Additionally, it has a sporty look that appeals to riders.

Yamaha XSR900 2016

Yamaha XSR900 2016

The Yamaha XSR900, on the other hand, has a greedy engine and well-tuned riding modes. It also features ABS and TC as standard and has an authentic modern design with clean workmanship.

However, the BMW R 1250 R has some weaknesses, including a long surcharge list and no visually new features. The Yamaha XSR900 has a hard chassis and a seat that could be more comfortable. Additionally, its speedblock design is already seen on many other models.

In conclusion, the BMW R 1250 R 2019 and the Yamaha XSR900 2016 are both impressive naked bikes with their own strengths and weaknesses. The BMW R 1250 R offers a more powerful engine and advanced rider assistance systems, while the Yamaha XSR900 has a unique design and well-tuned riding modes. Ultimately, the choice between these two bikes will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.

Technical Specifications BMW R 1250 R 2019 compared to Yamaha XSR900 2016

BMW R 1250 R 2019
Yamaha XSR900 2016
Show all
Same only
Differences
BMW R 1250 R 2019
BMW R 1250 R 2019
Yamaha XSR900 2016
Yamaha XSR900 2016

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeBoxerEngine typeIn line
BoreBore102.5 mmBore78 mm
StrokeStroke76 mmStroke59.1 mm
Engine powerEngine power136 HPEngine power115 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power7,750 rpmRpm at Max. Power10,000 rpm
TorqueTorque143 NmTorque87.5 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque6,250 rpmRpm at Torque8,500 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12.5 Compression Ratio11.5
StarterStarterElectricStarterElectric
Clutch TypeClutch TypeAntihoppingClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionProp shaftTransmissionChain
Transmission TypeTransmission TypeGearshiftTransmission TypeGearshift
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders2Cylinders3
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesDOHC
CoolingCoolingliquid-airCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement1,254 ccmDisplacement847 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
TravelTravel140 mmTravel137 mm

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSingle swing armSuspensionSwing arm
Shock absorberShock absorberMonoshockShock absorberMonoshock
TravelTravel140 mmTravel130 mm

Chassis

FrameFrameSteelFrameAluminium
Frame typeFrame typeLoad-bearing engineFrame typeTwin Tube
RakeRake62.3 degreeRake65 degree
TrailTrail126.6 mmTrail103 mm

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
DiameterDiameter320 mmDiameter298 mm

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
DiameterDiameter276 mmDiameter245 mm

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS, Anti-slipping control, Riding modes, Ride by WireAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width180 mmRear tyre width180 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,165 mmLength2,075 mm
WidthWidth880 mmWidth815 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,515 mmWheelbase1,440 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height820 mmSeat Height815 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)239 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)191 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity18 lFuel Tank Capacity14 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

BMW R 1250 R 2019

BMW R 1250 R 2019

What could be better than getting even more power and torque in an already powerful naked bike! The predecessor, the R 1200 R, with its 125 hp and Newton metres of torque, could already be ridden very sportily, but the enlarged R 1250 R, now with 136 hp and a massive 143 Newton metres, pushes the boxer power to its current peak. The special thing about the R 1250 R, as with its predecessor, is that thanks to the extensive range of accessories it can also convince on tours. The new engine with ShiftCam valve control is not only more powerful but also more refined. The chassis and brakes are also convincing, and the seating position is pleasantly upright, allowing a wide range of riding styles, from sporty push-off to long-distance touring.

powerful boxer engine

good sound

comfortable seating position

ABS and traction control standard

riding modes

sporty look

Long surcharge list

visually nothing new

Yamaha XSR900 2016

Yamaha XSR900 2016

The XSR900 combines the performance of a sporty streetfighter with the look of a pleasing, cleanly finished retro naked bike. In doing so, the Japanese make use of their own history, which can be found bundled and without gaps in the archive of the design agency that has been working for Yamaha for 60 years. It adopts the virtues of the MT-09 and has mended some of its weaknesses. It rides more harmoniously, more controlled and, if desired, more relaxed. Only the comfort, and thus the rider, suffers from the tight chassis on bad roads. You have to be a little bit sensitive when it comes to a neo-classic.

Greedy engine

well-tuned riding modes

ABS and TC as standard

authentic modern design

clean workmanship

hard chassis

seat should be more comfortable

speedblock design already on many other models

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price BMW R 1250 R vs Yamaha XSR900

There are a few key differences between a BMW R 1250 R 2019 and a Yamaha XSR900 2016. In terms of price, the actual average price of a BMW R 1250 R 2019 is about 98% higher. Compared to Yamaha XSR900 2016 there are more BMW R 1250 R 2019 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 15 compared to 5. It takes less time to sell a Yamaha XSR900 with 77 days compared to 83 days for the BMW R 1250 R. Since model year 2019 1000PS.de editors have written 11 reviews for the BMW R 1250 R and 30 reviews for the Yamaha XSR900 since model year 2016. The first review for the BMW R 1250 R was published on 06/11/2018 and now has more than 73,800 views. This compares to more than 17,600 views for the first review on Yamaha XSR900 published on 25/11/2015.

Price BMW R 1250 R

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Yamaha XSR900

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUISSchuberthMotorex AGcalimoto GmbHContinental Motorradreifen