Husqvarna WR 300 2009 vs. Beta RR 300 2T 2021

Husqvarna WR 300 2009

Husqvarna WR 300 2009

Beta RR 300 2T 2021

Beta RR 300 2T 2021

Loading...

Overview - Husqvarna WR 300 2009 vs Beta RR 300 2T 2021

Husqvarna WR 300 2009

Husqvarna WR 300 2009

Beta RR 300 2T 2021

Beta RR 300 2T 2021

Technical Specifications Husqvarna WR 300 2009 compared to Beta RR 300 2T 2021

Husqvarna WR 300 2009
Beta RR 300 2T 2021

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore72 mmBore72 mm
StrokeStroke72 mmStroke72 mm
StarterStarterKickStarterElectric
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement293 ccmDisplacement293.1 ccm

Brakes Front

TechnologyTechnologyWaveTechnologyWave

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter21 inchFront tyre diameter21 inch
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter18 inchRear tyre diameter18 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,465 mmWheelbase1,482 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height975 mmSeat Height930 mm
Dry WeightDry Weight104 kgDry Weight103.5 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity9.5 lFuel Tank Capacity9.5 l

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Husqvarna WR 300 vs Beta RR 300 2T

Price Husqvarna WR 300

Unfortunately, the data available to us is not sufficient to provide meaningful price information for this model.

Price Beta RR 300 2T

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH