BMW K 1300 R 2016 vs. BMW S 1000 R 2023

BMW K 1300 R 2016

BMW K 1300 R 2016

BMW S 1000 R 2023

BMW S 1000 R 2023

Loading...

Overview - BMW K 1300 R 2016 vs BMW S 1000 R 2023

BMW K 1300 R 2016

BMW K 1300 R 2016

BMW S 1000 R 2023

BMW S 1000 R 2023

Technical Specifications BMW K 1300 R 2016 compared to BMW S 1000 R 2023

BMW K 1300 R 2016
BMW S 1000 R 2023

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore80 mmBore80 mm
StrokeStroke64.3 mmStroke49.7 mm
Engine powerEngine power172 HPEngine power165 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power9,250 rpmRpm at Max. Power11,000 rpm
TorqueTorque140 NmTorque114 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque8,250 rpmRpm at Torque9,250 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio13 Compression Ratio12.5
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath, Antihopping
TransmissionTransmissionProp shaftTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders4Cylinders4
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement1,293 ccmDisplacement999 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionStrutFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSingle swing armSuspensionSwing arm

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameAluminium
Frame typeFrame typeTwin Tube, Load-bearing engineFrame typeTwin Tube

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons
Shock mountShock mountFixed caliperShock mountFixed caliper

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonDouble pistonPistonSingle piston
Shock mountShock mountFloating caliperShock mountFloating caliper

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width180 mmRear tyre width190 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,228 mmLength2,090 mm
WidthWidth856 mmWidth812 mm
HeightHeight1,095 mmHeight1,115 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,585 mmWheelbase1,450 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height820 mmSeat Height830 mm
Kerb WeightKerb Weight242 kgKerb Weight199 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity19 lFuel Tank Capacity16.5 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

BMW K 1300 R 2016

BMW K 1300 R 2016

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

BMW S 1000 R 2023

BMW S 1000 R 2023

The seating position is sporty, but by no means uncomfortable, the brakes are powerful and the engine of the S 1000 R is at its best - perhaps even a little too homogeneous. There is also nothing to complain about on the riding side. Based on the pure performance data and the installed electronic features, the BMW probably has what it takes for the fastest lap time. And that on any kind of surface, because with the semi-active suspension you can eat up kilometre after kilometre on bad roads littered with potholes. Unfortunately, this feeling of superiority never really spilled over to the driver. Probably the downside of too much balance in all areas - at least in my Italophile eyes. The BMW lacked that certain something, the charisma, which is difficult to explain but arouses genuine emotions.

powerful engine

strong brakes

comfortable ergonomics

good standard equipment

extensive range of accessories

Sluggish shift assistant

optics not 100% coherent

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price BMW K 1300 R vs BMW S 1000 R

Price BMW K 1300 R

Model year
Current average market prices

Price BMW S 1000 R

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH