KTM 125 EXC 2016 vs. Husqvarna FC 350 2019

KTM 125 EXC 2016

KTM 125 EXC 2016

Husqvarna FC 350 2019

Husqvarna FC 350 2019

Loading...

Technical Specifications KTM 125 EXC 2016 compared to Husqvarna FC 350 2019

KTM 125 EXC 2016
Husqvarna FC 350 2019

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore54 mmBore88 mm
StrokeStroke54.5 mmStroke57.5 mm
StrokesStrokes2-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement124.8 ccmDisplacement349.7 ccm

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width90 mmFront tyre width80 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height90 %Front tyre height100 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter21 inchFront tyre diameter21 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width120 mmRear tyre width110 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height90 %Rear tyre height90 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter18 inchRear tyre diameter19 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,471 mmWheelbase1,485 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height960 mmSeat Height960 mm
Dry WeightDry Weight94 kgDry Weight100.4 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity9.5 lFuel Tank Capacity7 l

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

KTM 125 EXC 2016

KTM 125 EXC 2016

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Husqvarna FC 350 2019

Husqvarna FC 350 2019

The Husqvarna FC 350 offers a successful overall package that differs from the identically constructed KTM 350 EXC-F in the details. The powerful unit impresses with clean power, even when the engine has to be kept at high revs. In terms of handling, the fork of the Husqvarna FC 350 dips too much, which makes the ride a little angular. The brakes, on the other hand, are easy to apply, even if the pressure point is very tight.

Good traction

brakes with good dosing

Fork dips too far

narrow brake pressure point

Price Comparison Average Market Price KTM 125 EXC vs Husqvarna FC 350

Price KTM 125 EXC

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Husqvarna FC 350

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons