Yamaha MT-09 SP 2021 vs. BMW S 1000 R 2022

Yamaha MT-09 SP 2021

Yamaha MT-09 SP 2021

BMW S 1000 R 2022

BMW S 1000 R 2022

Loading...

Overview - Yamaha MT-09 SP 2021 vs BMW S 1000 R 2022

In terms of engine and drive train, the Yamaha MT-09 SP 2021 is equipped with an in-line 3-cylinder engine that produces 119 HP of power and 93 Nm of torque. On the other hand, the BMW S 1000 R 2022 features an in-line 4-cylinder engine that delivers a more powerful 165 HP of power and 114 Nm of torque. This gives the BMW an advantage in terms of sheer performance.

Both bikes have fuel injection systems and liquid cooling, ensuring efficient and reliable operation. The Yamaha has a displacement of 889ccm, while the BMW has a slightly larger displacement of 999ccm.

In terms of suspension, both bikes feature upside-down telescopic forks at the front and swing arm suspension with a monoshock at the rear. The suspension on both models is adjustable for compression, preload, and rebound, allowing riders to fine-tune the bike's handling to their preferences.

Both bikes have aluminum frames with a twin tube design, providing a balance of rigidity and weight savings. This contributes to their overall agility and handling characteristics.

Yamaha MT-09 SP 2021

Yamaha MT-09 SP 2021

When it comes to braking, both bikes are equipped with double disk brakes at the front. However, the BMW has larger diameter disks measuring 320mm compared to the Yamaha's 298mm. This gives the BMW an advantage in terms of braking power and stopping performance.

In terms of advanced rider assistance systems, both bikes come with ABS, traction control, and anti-wheelie features. The BMW also includes additional features such as hill start assist, riding modes, and cornering ABS. These systems enhance safety and control, especially in challenging riding conditions.

In terms of dimensions and weights, the Yamaha has a slightly smaller wheelbase of 1430mm compared to the BMW's 1450mm. The seat height is also slightly lower on the Yamaha at 825mm compared to the BMW's 830mm. The Yamaha weighs 189kg, while the BMW is slightly heavier at 199kg.

The fuel tank capacity is larger on the BMW, with a capacity of 16.5 liters compared to the Yamaha's 14 liters. However, the Yamaha has a slightly longer range of 280km compared to the BMW's 266km. The Yamaha also has a lower combined fuel consumption of 5 l/100km compared to the BMW's 6.2 l/100km.

BMW S 1000 R 2022

BMW S 1000 R 2022

In terms of strengths, the Yamaha MT-09 SP 2021 offers an upright and comfortable seating position, a well-tuned chassis, and quick and easy adjustment of mappings and traction control. It also boasts high-quality workmanship, lovely details, and a great tuned engine that delivers excellent acceleration and a lot of pressure in the relevant rev range.

The BMW S 1000 R 2022, on the other hand, has a powerful engine, strong brakes, comfortable ergonomics, good standard equipment, and an extensive range of accessories. These features make it a compelling option for riders seeking a high-performance naked bike.

However, both bikes have their weaknesses. The Yamaha MT-09 SP 2021 has a horn mounted in a crude way and a poor display. The BMW S 1000 R 2022, on the other hand, has a sluggish shift assistant and optics that are not 100% coherent.

In summary, the Yamaha MT-09 SP 2021 and the BMW S 1000 R 2022 are both impressive naked bikes with their own strengths and weaknesses. The Yamaha offers a well-tuned chassis and a great engine, while the BMW delivers more power and features a range of accessories. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.

Technical Specifications Yamaha MT-09 SP 2021 compared to BMW S 1000 R 2022

Yamaha MT-09 SP 2021
BMW S 1000 R 2022

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore78 mmBore80 mm
StrokeStroke62.1 mmStroke49.7 mm
Engine powerEngine power119 HPEngine power165 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power10,000 rpmRpm at Max. Power11,000 rpm
TorqueTorque93 NmTorque114 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque7,000 rpmRpm at Torque9,250 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio11.5 Compression Ratio12.5
Fuel systemFuel systemInjectionFuel systemInjection
StarterStarterElectricStarterElectric
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath, Antihopping
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Transmission TypeTransmission TypeGearshiftTransmission TypeGearshift
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders3Cylinders4
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesDOHC, Drag lever
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement889 ccmDisplacement999 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
TravelTravel137 mmTravel120 mm
AdjustmentAdjustmentCompression, Preload, ReboundAdjustmentCompression, Preload, Rebound

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionSwing arm
Shock absorberShock absorberMonoshockShock absorberMonoshock
TravelTravel142 mmTravel117 mm
AdjustmentAdjustmentCompression, Preload, ReboundAdjustmentCompression, Preload, Rebound

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameAluminium
Frame typeFrame typeTwin TubeFrame typeTwin Tube
RakeRake65 degreeRake65.8 degree
TrailTrail108 mmTrail96 mm

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
DiameterDiameter298 mmDiameter320 mm

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
DiameterDiameter245 mmDiameter220 mm

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS, Cornering ABS, Ride by Wire, Quickshifter, Traction control, Anti-wheelieAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS, Hill start assist, Riding modes, Cornering ABS, Ride by Wire, Quickshifter, Traction control, Anti-wheelie

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width180 mmRear tyre width190 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,090 mmLength2,090 mm
WidthWidth795 mmWidth812 mm
HeightHeight1,190 mmHeight1,115 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,430 mmWheelbase1,450 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height825 mmSeat Height830 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)189 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)199 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity14 lFuel Tank Capacity16.5 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA
RangeRange280 kmRange266 km
Combined CO2 emissionsCombined CO2 emissions116 g/kmCombined CO2 emissions144 g/km
Combined fuel consumptionCombined fuel consumption5 l/100kmCombined fuel consumption6.2 l/100km

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Yamaha MT-09 SP 2021

Yamaha MT-09 SP 2021

The Yamaha MT-09 SP is based on the really well-done MT-09. In 2021, a particularly fine vintage! But the upgrade goes one better! The high-quality chassis provides a great compromise between riding comfort and sportiness.

Upright, comfortable seating position

Well-tuned chassis

Mappings and traction control are quick and easy to adjust

High-quality workmanship

Lovely details

Great tuned engine

Great acceleration and lots of pressure in the relevant rev range.

Horn mounted in a crude way

poor display

BMW S 1000 R 2022

BMW S 1000 R 2022

The seating position is sporty, but by no means uncomfortable, the brakes are powerful and the engine of the S 1000 R is at its best - perhaps even a little too homogeneous. There is also nothing to complain about on the riding side. Based on the pure performance data and the installed electronic features, the BMW probably has what it takes for the fastest lap time. And that on any kind of surface, because with the semi-active suspension you can eat up kilometre after kilometre on bad roads littered with potholes. Unfortunately, this feeling of superiority never really spilled over to the driver. Probably the downside of too much balance in all areas - at least in my Italophile eyes. The BMW lacked that certain something, the charisma, which is difficult to explain but arouses genuine emotions.

powerful engine

strong brakes

comfortable ergonomics

good standard equipment

extensive range of accessories

Sluggish shift assistant

optics not 100% coherent

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Yamaha MT-09 SP vs BMW S 1000 R

There are a few key differences between a Yamaha MT-09 SP 2021 and a BMW S 1000 R 2022. In terms of price, the actual average price of a BMW S 1000 R 2022 is about 54% higher. Compared to BMW S 1000 R 2022 there are less Yamaha MT-09 SP 2021 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 15 compared to 22. It takes less time to sell a BMW S 1000 R with 71 days compared to 120 days for the Yamaha MT-09 SP. Since model year 2018 1000PS.de editors have written 29 reviews for the Yamaha MT-09 SP and 62 reviews for the BMW S 1000 R since model year 2014. The first review for the Yamaha MT-09 SP was published on 06/11/2017 and now has more than 49,000 views. This compares to more than 17,300 views for the first review on BMW S 1000 R published on 03/11/2013.

Price Yamaha MT-09 SP

Model year
Current average market prices

Price BMW S 1000 R

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH