BMW S 1000 RR 2018 vs. Husqvarna 701 Supermoto 2022

BMW S 1000 RR 2018

Husqvarna 701 Supermoto 2022
Loading...
Technical Specifications BMW S 1000 RR 2018 compared to Husqvarna 701 Supermoto 2022
BMW S 1000 RR 2018
Husqvarna 701 Supermoto 2022
Engine and Drive Train
Bore | Bore | 80 mm | Bore | 105 mm |
---|---|---|---|---|
Stroke | Stroke | 49.7 mm | Stroke | 80 mm |
Engine power | Engine power | 199 HP | Engine power | 74 HP |
Rpm at Max. Power | Rpm at Max. Power | 13,500 rpm | Rpm at Max. Power | 8,000 rpm |
Torque | Torque | 113 Nm | Torque | 73.5 Nm |
Rpm at Torque | Rpm at Torque | 10,500 rpm | Rpm at Torque | 6,500 rpm |
Compression Ratio | Compression Ratio | 13 | Compression Ratio | 12.7 |
Fuel system | Fuel system | Injection | Fuel system | Injection |
Starter | Starter | Electric | Starter | Electric |
Clutch Type | Clutch Type | Multiplate in oil-bath, Antihopping | Clutch Type | Antihopping |
Transmission | Transmission | Chain | Transmission | Chain |
Transmission Type | Transmission Type | Gearshift | Transmission Type | Gearshift |
Number of gears | Number of gears | 6 | Number of gears | 6 |
Cylinders | Cylinders | 4 | Cylinders | 1 |
Strokes | Strokes | 4-Stroke | Strokes | 4-Stroke |
Valves per cylinder | Valves per cylinder | 4 | Valves per cylinder | 4 |
Cooling | Cooling | liquid | Cooling | liquid |
Displacement | Displacement | 999 ccm | Displacement | 692.7 ccm |
Suspension Front
Front suspension | Front suspension | Upside-Down telescopic fork | Front suspension | Upside-Down telescopic fork |
---|
Suspension Rear
Suspension | Suspension | Swing arm | Suspension | Swing arm |
---|
Chassis
Frame | Frame | Aluminium | Frame | Chromium-molybdenum |
---|---|---|---|---|
Frame type | Frame type | Twin Tube | Frame type | Tubular |
Brakes Front
Type | Type | Double disk | Type | Single disk |
---|---|---|---|---|
Piston | Piston | Four pistons | Piston | Four pistons |
Shock mount | Shock mount | Floating caliper | Shock mount | Floating caliper |
Technology | Technology | radial | Technology | radial |
Brakes Rear
Type | Type | Disc | Type | Disc |
---|---|---|---|---|
Piston | Piston | Single piston | Piston | Single piston |
Shock mount | Shock mount | Floating caliper | Shock mount | Floating caliper |
Dimensions and Weights
Front tyre width | Front tyre width | 120 mm | Front tyre width | 120 mm |
---|---|---|---|---|
Front tyre height | Front tyre height | 70 % | Front tyre height | 70 % |
Front tyre diameter | Front tyre diameter | 17 inch | Front tyre diameter | 17 inch |
Rear tyre width | Rear tyre width | 190 mm | Rear tyre width | 160 mm |
Rear tyre height | Rear tyre height | 55 % | Rear tyre height | 60 % |
Rear tyre diameter | Rear tyre diameter | 17 inch | Rear tyre diameter | 17 inch |
Wheelbase | Wheelbase | 1,438 mm | Wheelbase | 1,470 mm |
Seat Height | Seat Height | 815 mm | Seat Height | 890 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | Fuel Tank Capacity | 17.5 l | Fuel Tank Capacity | 13 l |
License compliancy | License compliancy | A | License compliancy | A |
Pros and Cons in comparison
Pros and Cons in comparison
BMW S 1000 RR 2018

The well-balanced universal talent will also be at the forefront of many comparison tests in 2017. It still scores with the outstanding engine and the universal and complete equipment.
On request with complete electronic equipment. All features available in high quality
Strong engine - powerful and easy to control
Comfortable seating position even for taller riders
Good chassis on the road and at trackdays
Brake fade on the racetrack under high load
Ride quality high enough for trackdays but not good enough for racing
Looks greyed out even though it is technically up to date
Husqvarna 701 Supermoto 2022

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.
Price Comparison Avarage Market Price BMW S 1000 RR vs Husqvarna 701 Supermoto
Price BMW S 1000 RR
Model year
Current average market prices
Price Husqvarna 701 Supermoto
Model year
Current average market prices