Husqvarna TE 300 2015 vs. Husqvarna FC 350 2017

Husqvarna TE 300 2015

Husqvarna TE 300 2015

Husqvarna FC 350 2017

Husqvarna FC 350 2017

Loading...

Overview - Husqvarna TE 300 2015 vs Husqvarna FC 350 2017

The Husqvarna TE 300 2015 and the Husqvarna FC 350 2017 are both high-performance motorcycles designed for different purposes. The TE 300 is an enduro motorcycle, while the FC 350 is a motocross bike.

In terms of engine specifications, the TE 300 has a 293.2cc 2-stroke engine with a bore and stroke of 72mm. It features an electric and kick starter, while the FC 350 has a 349.7cc 4-stroke engine with a bore and stroke of 88mm and 57.5mm respectively. It only has an electric starter. Both bikes have a single cylinder configuration and use a chain transmission.

The suspension system on both bikes is similar, with upside-down telescopic forks at the front and a deflection shock mount at the rear. The suspension components are provided by WP for both models.

Husqvarna TE 300 2015

Husqvarna TE 300 2015

In terms of chassis, both bikes have a steel frame with a central tube design. This provides stability and durability for off-road riding.

In terms of dimensions and weights, the FC 350 has a slightly longer wheelbase at 1495mm compared to the TE 300's 1482mm. The seat height of the FC 350 is also higher at 992mm compared to the TE 300's 960mm. The dry weight of the FC 350 is slightly heavier at 106.4kg compared to the TE 300's 104.6kg. The fuel tank capacity of the TE 300 is larger at 11 liters compared to the FC 350's 7.5 liters.

Husqvarna FC 350 2017

Husqvarna FC 350 2017

The TE 300 has several strengths, including being lightweight, powerful, and extremely fast. Its engine is easy to control and provides lots of traction in the lower rev range, while still offering power for every situation in the upper rev range. Additionally, the TE 300 is inexpensive to run with minimal service costs and is known for its reliability.

On the other hand, the FC 350 is praised for its good traction and brakes with good dosing. However, it has a few weaknesses, including a fork that dips too far and a narrow brake pressure point.

In summary, the Husqvarna TE 300 2015 is a lightweight and powerful enduro motorcycle, known for its traction and reliability. The Husqvarna FC 350 2017, on the other hand, is a motocross bike with good traction and brakes, but has some issues with the fork and brake pressure.

Technical Specifications Husqvarna TE 300 2015 compared to Husqvarna FC 350 2017

Husqvarna TE 300 2015
Husqvarna FC 350 2017
Show all
Same only
Differences
Husqvarna TE 300 2015
Husqvarna TE 300 2015
Husqvarna FC 350 2017
Husqvarna FC 350 2017

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
BrandBrandWPBrandWP

Chassis

FrameFrameSteelFrameSteel
Frame typeFrame typeCentral tubeFrame typeCentral tube

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width90 mmFront tyre width80 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height90 %Front tyre height100 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter21 inchFront tyre diameter21 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width140 mmRear tyre width110 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height80 %Rear tyre height90 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter18 inchRear tyre diameter19 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,482 mmWheelbase1,495 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height960 mmSeat Height992 mm
Dry WeightDry Weight104.6 kgDry Weight106.4 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity11 lFuel Tank Capacity7.5 l

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Husqvarna TE 300 2015

Husqvarna TE 300 2015

The racing machine for two-stroke enthusiasts. Perfectly tuned and fast as an arrow. A bestseller in the Husvqarna range! And rightly so! In the test, we also tried it in combination with a Rekluse clutch. But the overall package seemed a little too nervous. The TE300 is best enjoyed with a conventional clutch.

Lightweight, powerful, extremely fast

engine easy to control

lots of traction in the lower rev range, power for every situation in the upper rev range

inexpensive to run, hardly any service costs

reliable! The huge engine runs 95% of the time at partial load anyway.

More nervous and strenuous on connecting stages than a four-stroke

lower range than with four-stroke

Husqvarna FC 350 2017

Husqvarna FC 350 2017

The Husqvarna FC 350 offers a successful overall package that differs from the identically constructed KTM 350 EXC-F in the details. The powerful unit impresses with clean power, even when the engine has to be kept at high revs. In terms of handling, the fork of the Husqvarna FC 350 dips too much, which makes the ride a little angular. The brakes, on the other hand, are easy to apply, even if the pressure point is very tight.

Good traction

brakes with good dosing

Fork dips too far

narrow brake pressure point

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Husqvarna TE 300 vs Husqvarna FC 350

There are a few key differences between a Husqvarna TE 300 2015 and a Husqvarna FC 350 2017. It takes less time to sell a Husqvarna TE 300 with 37 days compared to 94 days for a Husqvarna FC 350. Since model year 2014 1000PS.de editors have written 6 reviews for the Husqvarna TE 300 and 3 reviews for the Husqvarna FC 350 since model year 2014. The first review for the Husqvarna TE 300 was published on 03/11/2013 and now has more than 6,800 views. This compares to more than 66,200 views for the first review on Husqvarna FC 350 published on 06/11/2017.

Price Husqvarna TE 300

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Husqvarna FC 350

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUISSchuberthcalimoto GmbHContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AG