Husqvarna TE 310 2011 vs. Beta RR 50 Factory 2013

Husqvarna TE 310 2011

Husqvarna TE 310 2011

Beta RR 50 Factory 2013

Beta RR 50 Factory 2013

Loading...

Overview - Husqvarna TE 310 2011 vs Beta RR 50 Factory 2013

Husqvarna TE 310 2011

Husqvarna TE 310 2011

Beta RR 50 Factory 2013

Beta RR 50 Factory 2013

Technical Specifications Husqvarna TE 310 2011 compared to Beta RR 50 Factory 2013

Husqvarna TE 310 2011
Beta RR 50 Factory 2013

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore83 mmBore40.3 mm
StrokeStroke55 mmStroke39 mm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12.9 Compression Ratio12
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes2-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement297 ccmDisplacement49.7 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionTelescopic fork

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width90 mmFront tyre width80 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height90 %Front tyre height90 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter21 inchFront tyre diameter21 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width120 mmRear tyre width110 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height90 %Rear tyre height80 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter18 inchRear tyre diameter18 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,495 mmWheelbase1,415 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height963 mmSeat Height935 mm
Dry WeightDry Weight111 kgDry Weight85 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity7.2 lFuel Tank Capacity6.5 l

Alternative Comparisons