Triumph Speed Triple S 2016 vs. BMW F 900 R 2021

Triumph Speed Triple S 2016

Triumph Speed Triple S 2016

BMW F 900 R 2021

BMW F 900 R 2021

Loading...

Overview - Triumph Speed Triple S 2016 vs BMW F 900 R 2021

In terms of engine and drive train, both the Triumph Speed Triple S 2016 and the BMW F 900 R 2021 have in-line engines. However, the Speed Triple S has a more powerful engine with 140 HP compared to the F 900 R's 105 HP. The Speed Triple S also has higher torque at 112 Nm compared to the F 900 R's 92 Nm. The Speed Triple S has three cylinders while the F 900 R has two. Both bikes have liquid cooling and similar displacements, with the Speed Triple S at 1050 ccm and the F 900 R at 895 ccm.

In terms of suspension, both bikes have upside-down telescopic forks at the front. The Speed Triple S has a single swing arm suspension at the rear with a monoshock absorber that can be adjusted for compression and rebound. On the other hand, the F 900 R has a swing arm suspension at the rear with a monoshock absorber that can be adjusted for preload and rebound.

In terms of chassis, the Speed Triple S has an aluminum frame with a twin tube design, while the F 900 R has a steel frame with a twin tube design and a load-bearing engine.

Triumph Speed Triple S 2016

Triumph Speed Triple S 2016

Both bikes have double disk brakes at the front with a diameter of 320 mm and four pistons. The brakes on both bikes also use radial technology.

In terms of dimensions and weights, both bikes have a front tire width of 120 mm and a front tire diameter of 17 inches. The Speed Triple S has a wider rear tire at 190 mm compared to the F 900 R's 180 mm. Both bikes have a rear tire diameter of 17 inches. The Speed Triple S has a wheelbase of 1435 mm while the F 900 R has a longer wheelbase of 1518 mm. The seat height of the Speed Triple S is 825 mm, slightly higher than the F 900 R's 815 mm. The Speed Triple S also has a larger fuel tank capacity at 15.5 liters compared to the F 900 R's 13 liters.

Now, let's compare the strengths and weaknesses of each bike. The Speed Triple S has the advantage of a three-cylinder engine, which gives it a distinctive sound. It also has a distinctive look and good brakes. The sporty seating position adds to the overall experience. Additionally, the Speed Triple S has a well-functioning electronics package.

On the other hand, the F 900 R has a great cockpit with functional connectivity. The extensive electronics on the bike can be operated logically, making it user-friendly. The bike also offers very accessible handling while still maintaining a casual feel. It can be ridden in a reserved manner or in a wild and sporty way when needed. The seating position is pleasant, and there is a wide choice of equipment and configuration options available. The F 900 R also offers low and high seat options. The suspension on the F 900 R allows for a wide range of use, providing both comfort and direct, precise handling.

BMW F 900 R 2021

BMW F 900 R 2021

However, the Speed Triple S does have some weaknesses. The engine could be more responsive at the bottom end, and the handling can feel somewhat sluggish.

Similarly, the F 900 R has a few weaknesses. The gearstick can be a little stiff, especially with the quickshifter. The engine runs a little rough and lacks elegance at the top. Additionally, the rear splash guard is poor.

In conclusion, the Triumph Speed Triple S 2016 and the BMW F 900 R 2021 are both naked bikes with their own strengths and weaknesses. The Speed Triple S offers a powerful engine and distinctive look, while the F 900 R provides a great cockpit, user-friendly electronics, and versatile handling. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.

Technical Specifications Triumph Speed Triple S 2016 compared to BMW F 900 R 2021

Triumph Speed Triple S 2016
BMW F 900 R 2021
Show all
Same only
Differences
Triumph Speed Triple S 2016
Triumph Speed Triple S 2016
BMW F 900 R 2021
BMW F 900 R 2021

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore79 mmBore86 mm
StrokeStroke71.4 mmStroke77 mm
Engine powerEngine power140 HPEngine power105 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power9,500 rpmRpm at Max. Power8,500 rpm
TorqueTorque112 NmTorque92 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque7,850 rpmRpm at Torque6,500 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12 Compression Ratio13.1
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Transmission TypeTransmission TypeGearshiftTransmission TypeGearshift
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders3Cylinders2
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesDOHC
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement1,050 ccmDisplacement895 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSingle swing armSuspensionSwing arm
Shock absorberShock absorberMonoshockShock absorberMonoshock
AdjustmentAdjustmentCompression, ReboundAdjustmentPreload, Rebound

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameSteel
Frame typeFrame typeTwin TubeFrame typeTwin Tube, Load-bearing engine

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
DiameterDiameter320 mmDiameter320 mm
PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons
TechnologyTechnologyradialTechnologyradial

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonDouble pistonPistonSingle piston
Shock mountShock mountFloating caliperShock mountFloating caliper

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width190 mmRear tyre width180 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,100 mmLength2,140 mm
WidthWidth795 mmWidth815 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,435 mmWheelbase1,518 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height825 mmSeat Height815 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity15.5 lFuel Tank Capacity13 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Triumph Speed Triple S 2016

Triumph Speed Triple S 2016

The Speed Triple remains true to its line in the latest generation - a wonderfully sharp naked bike that characterises the streetfighter style like hardly any other model. It only makes limited sense for the racetrack - of course, the roaring three-cylinder engine with 140 hp is enormous fun and the Fafhrwerk shows no gross weaknesses, but there is a Speed Triple R with Öhlins suspension elements that naturally feels more at home on the racetrack. All in all, the Speed Triple S is an excellent country road fighter that also has a lot to offer in terms of looks.

Three-cylinder engine with distinctive sound

distinctive look

good brakes

sporty seating position

well-functioning electronics package.

Engine could be more responsive at the bottom end

somewhat sluggish handling

BMW F 900 R 2021

BMW F 900 R 2021

The BMW F 900 R is a full-grown motorbike. 895 cc, 105 hp and 92 Nm smell of versatility. The F 900 R fulfils this promise completely. The motorbike, including electronics and components, does a great job in every situation. But of all things, the heart of the bike, the engine and transmission unit, does not shine in premium gloss.

Great cockpit and functional connectivity

Extensive electronics can be operated logically

Very accessible but still very casual handling

Motorcycle rides bland and reserved but also wild and sporty when needed

Pleasant seating position

Wide choice of equipment and configuration options

Low and high seat options available

Suspension allows wide range of use - comfortable but also direct and precise.

Gearstick a little stiff - with and without quickshifter

Engine runs a little rough and exudes little elegance at the top

Poor splash guard at the rear

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Triumph Speed Triple S vs BMW F 900 R

There are a few key differences between a Triumph Speed Triple S 2016 and a BMW F 900 R 2021. It takes less time to sell a BMW F 900 R with 67 days compared to 93 days for the Triumph Speed Triple S. Since model year 2016 1000PS.de editors have written 6 reviews for the Triumph Speed Triple S and 24 reviews for the BMW F 900 R since model year 2020. The first review for the Triumph Speed Triple S was published on 23/10/2011 and now has more than 10,300 views. This compares to more than 154,700 views for the first review on BMW F 900 R published on 05/11/2019.

Price Triumph Speed Triple S

Model year
Current average market prices

Price BMW F 900 R

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUISSchuberthMotorex AGcalimoto GmbHContinental Motorradreifen