Husqvarna TE 125 2011 vs. Beta RE 125 4T 2016

Husqvarna TE 125 2011

Husqvarna TE 125 2011

Beta RE 125 4T 2016

Beta RE 125 4T 2016

Loading...

Overview - Husqvarna TE 125 2011 vs Beta RE 125 4T 2016

Husqvarna TE 125 2011

Husqvarna TE 125 2011

Beta RE 125 4T 2016

Beta RE 125 4T 2016

Technical Specifications Husqvarna TE 125 2011 compared to Beta RE 125 4T 2016

Husqvarna TE 125 2011
Beta RE 125 4T 2016

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore54 mmBore54 mm
StrokeStroke54.5 mmStroke54 mm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio8.8 Compression Ratio10
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes2-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement124 ccmDisplacement124 ccm

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width80 mmFront tyre width90 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height100 %Front tyre height90 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter21 inchFront tyre diameter21 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width100 mmRear tyre width120 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height90 %Rear tyre height80 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter19 inchRear tyre diameter18 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,460 mmWheelbase1,370 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height985 mmSeat Height890 mm
Dry WeightDry Weight92 kgDry Weight102 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity7 lFuel Tank Capacity5.7 l

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH