BMW S 1000 R 2020 vs. KTM 1190 Adventure R 2013

BMW S 1000 R 2020

BMW S 1000 R 2020

KTM 1190 Adventure R 2013

KTM 1190 Adventure R 2013

Loading...

Overview - BMW S 1000 R 2020 vs KTM 1190 Adventure R 2013

BMW S 1000 R 2020

BMW S 1000 R 2020

KTM 1190 Adventure R 2013

KTM 1190 Adventure R 2013

Technical Specifications BMW S 1000 R 2020 compared to KTM 1190 Adventure R 2013

BMW S 1000 R 2020
KTM 1190 Adventure R 2013

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore80 mmBore105 mm
StrokeStroke49.7 mmStroke69 mm
Engine powerEngine power165 HPEngine power150 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power11,000 rpmRpm at Max. Power9,500 rpm
TorqueTorque114 NmTorque125 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque9,250 rpmRpm at Torque7,500 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12 Compression Ratio12.5
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath, AntihoppingClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders4Cylinders2
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement999 ccmDisplacement1,195 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameChromium-molybdenum
Frame typeFrame typeTwin TubeFrame typeTubular

Brakes Front

PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons
TechnologyTechnologyradialTechnologyradial

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonDouble piston
Shock mountShock mountFloating caliperShock mountFixed caliper

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS, Riding modesAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsRide by Wire

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width90 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height90 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter21 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width190 mmRear tyre width150 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height70 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter18 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,439 mmWheelbase1,580 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height814 mmSeat Height890 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity17.5 lFuel Tank Capacity23 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

BMW S 1000 R 2020

BMW S 1000 R 2020

The seating position is sporty, but by no means uncomfortable, the brakes are powerful and the engine of the S 1000 R is at its best - perhaps even a little too homogeneous. There is also nothing to complain about on the riding side. Based on the pure performance data and the installed electronic features, the BMW probably has what it takes for the fastest lap time. And that on any kind of surface, because with the semi-active suspension you can eat up kilometre after kilometre on bad roads littered with potholes. Unfortunately, this feeling of superiority never really spilled over to the driver. Probably the downside of too much balance in all areas - at least in my Italophile eyes. The BMW lacked that certain something, the charisma, which is difficult to explain but arouses genuine emotions.

powerful engine

strong brakes

comfortable ergonomics

good standard equipment

extensive range of accessories

Sluggish shift assistant

optics not 100% coherent

KTM 1190 Adventure R 2013

KTM 1190 Adventure R 2013

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price BMW S 1000 R vs KTM 1190 Adventure R

Price BMW S 1000 R

Model year
Current average market prices

Price KTM 1190 Adventure R

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH