BMW R 1200 R 2014 vs. Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013

BMW R 1200 R 2014

BMW R 1200 R 2014

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013

Loading...

Overview - BMW R 1200 R 2014 vs Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013

The BMW R 1200 R 2014 and the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013 are both naked bikes that offer sporty performance and a comfortable riding experience. However, there are some key differences between the two models.

In terms of engine power, the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 takes the lead with 135 HP compared to the BMW R 1200 R's 110 HP. The Speed Triple also has a higher torque of 111 Nm compared to the R 1200 R's 119 Nm. The Speed Triple's engine is an in-line three-cylinder, while the R 1200 R has a boxer twin-cylinder engine. Both bikes have liquid cooling systems, but the R 1200 R also features an oil-air cooling system.

BMW R 1200 R 2014

BMW R 1200 R 2014

In terms of suspension, the R 1200 R has a Telelever front suspension, while the Speed Triple has an Upside-Down telescopic fork. Both bikes have a twin-tube frame and four-piston radial front brakes. The dimensions and weights of the two bikes are quite similar, with the R 1200 R having a slightly wider rear tire at 180 mm compared to the Speed Triple's 190 mm.

In terms of seating position, both bikes offer an upright riding position, which is comfortable for long rides. The R 1200 R has a seat height of 800 mm, while the Speed Triple has a slightly higher seat height of 825 mm. The R 1200 R has a fuel tank capacity of 18 liters, while the Speed Triple has a slightly smaller tank at 17.5 liters.

In terms of strengths, the R 1200 R has a sporty look, a powerful engine, and a comfortable seating position. It also comes with ABS and traction control as standard, as well as two riding modes. On the other hand, the Speed Triple has a powerful three-cylinder engine, a sporty driving feel, and a stable frame.

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013

However, both bikes also have their weaknesses. The R 1200 R has many cool features that are only available at an extra cost, and its speedometer and rev counter are poorly readable. The Speed Triple's Showa suspension elements can be slightly uncomfortable, and it has a reputation for having slightly stubborn handling.

In conclusion, both the BMW R 1200 R 2014 and the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013 are capable naked bikes that offer a combination of sporty performance and comfortable riding. The choice between the two will ultimately come down to personal preference and priorities.

Technical Specifications BMW R 1200 R 2014 compared to Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013

BMW R 1200 R 2014
Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeBoxerEngine typeIn line
BoreBore101 mmBore79 mm
StrokeStroke73 mmStroke71.4 mm
Engine powerEngine power110 HPEngine power135 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power7,750 rpmRpm at Max. Power9,400 rpm
TorqueTorque119 NmTorque111 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque6,000 rpmRpm at Torque7,750 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12 Compression Ratio12
Clutch TypeClutch TypeToughened, DryClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionProp shaftTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders2Cylinders3
CoolingCoolingOil-airCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement1,170 ccmDisplacement1,050 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionTeleleverFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork

Chassis

Frame typeFrame typeLoad-bearing engineFrame typeTwin Tube

Brakes Front

PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons
TechnologyTechnologyradialTechnologyradial

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonDouble pistonPistonDouble piston

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width180 mmRear tyre width190 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,145 mmLength2,100 mm
WidthWidth906 mmWidth795 mm
HeightHeight1,285 mmHeight1,110 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height800 mmSeat Height825 mm
Kerb WeightKerb Weight223 kgKerb Weight214 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity18 lFuel Tank Capacity17.5 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

BMW R 1200 R 2014

BMW R 1200 R 2014

The predecessor was already able to be ridden in a sporty manner as well as convincing on tours, the new R 1200 R can do even more - thanks to the pannier system (of course at extra cost), travelling is still no problem, but it masters sport even better. Thanks to the now partially water-cooled boxer twin-cylinder engine, it is wonderfully agile - 125 hp may not seem like much on paper, but the engine pushes incredibly and behaves in a cultivated manner to boot. The chassis and brakes also score highly and the seating position is sporty and upright, covering a wide spectrum from wonderful fun to long-distance touring. Unfortunately, BMW also understands the trick with the surcharge list perfectly. The basic model is well equipped with ABS that can be deactivated, traction control that can also be deactivated and two driving modes, but many interesting gimmicks are almost obligatory - and of course drive the price way up.

Sporty look

powerful engine

good sound

comfortable seating position

ABS and traction control standard

two riding modes

Many cool features only available at extra cost

poorly readable speedometer and rev counter

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013

More power, more kilos, more rubber . It is certainly not the most manageable, which makes climbing the Tyrolean mountains over hundreds of hairpin bends exhausting at times. But it is more mature than the Street Triple, knows how to glide along the valley smoothly and without getting on your nerves, and for some reason feels more trustworthy and secure.

Powerful three-cylinder engine

sporty driving feel

upright seating

stable frame.

Showa suspension elements slightly uncomfortable

stubborn handling.

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price BMW R 1200 R vs Triumph Speed Triple 1050

There are a few key differences between a BMW R 1200 R 2014 and a Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013. In terms of price, the actual average price of a BMW R 1200 R 2014 is about 8% higher. Compared to Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2013 there are less BMW R 1200 R 2014 bikes available on the 1000PS.de Marketplace, specifically 4 compared to 5. It takes less time to sell a BMW R 1200 R with 63 days compared to 66 days for a Triumph Speed Triple 1050. Since model year 2007 1000PS.de editors have written 27 reviews for the BMW R 1200 R and 29 reviews for the Triumph Speed Triple 1050 since model year 2005. The first review for the BMW R 1200 R was published on 07/07/2006 and now has more than 14,900 views. This compares to more than 16,200 views for the first review on Triumph Speed Triple 1050 published on 02/10/2007.

Price BMW R 1200 R

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Triumph Speed Triple 1050

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH