Husqvarna TE 125 2013 vs. SWM RS 300 R 2016

Husqvarna TE 125 2013

Husqvarna TE 125 2013

SWM RS 300 R 2016

SWM RS 300 R 2016

Loading...

Overview - Husqvarna TE 125 2013 vs SWM RS 300 R 2016

Husqvarna TE 125 2013

Husqvarna TE 125 2013

SWM RS 300 R 2016

SWM RS 300 R 2016

Technical Specifications Husqvarna TE 125 2013 compared to SWM RS 300 R 2016

Husqvarna TE 125 2013
SWM RS 300 R 2016

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore54 mmBore83 mm
StrokeStroke54.5 mmStroke55 mm
StarterStarterKickStarterElectric
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes2-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement124 ccmDisplacement298 ccm

Suspension Front

BrandBrandKayabaBrandKayaba

Suspension Rear

BrandBrandKayabaBrandKayaba

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width80 mmFront tyre width90 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height100 %Front tyre height90 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter21 inchFront tyre diameter21 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width100 mmRear tyre width140 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height90 %Rear tyre height80 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter19 inchRear tyre diameter18 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,460 mmWheelbase1,495 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height985 mmSeat Height963 mm
Dry WeightDry Weight92 kgDry Weight107 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity7 lFuel Tank Capacity7.2 l

Price Comparison Average Market Price Husqvarna TE 125 vs SWM RS 300 R

Price Husqvarna TE 125

Model year
Current average market prices

Price SWM RS 300 R

Unfortunately, the data available to us is not sufficient to provide meaningful price information for this model.

Alternative Comparisons