Benelli 752 S 2020 vs. Kawasaki ER-6n 2016

Benelli 752 S 2020

Benelli 752 S 2020

Kawasaki ER-6n 2016

Kawasaki ER-6n 2016

Loading...

Overview - Benelli 752 S 2020 vs Kawasaki ER-6n 2016

Benelli 752 S 2020

Benelli 752 S 2020

Kawasaki ER-6n 2016

Kawasaki ER-6n 2016

Technical Specifications Benelli 752 S 2020 compared to Kawasaki ER-6n 2016

Benelli 752 S 2020
Kawasaki ER-6n 2016

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore88 mmBore83 mm
StrokeStroke62 mmStroke60 mm
Engine powerEngine power76.8 HPEngine power72 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power8,500 rpmRpm at Max. Power8,500 rpm
TorqueTorque67 NmTorque64 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque6,500 rpmRpm at Torque7,000 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio11.5 Compression Ratio10.8
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
CylindersCylinders2Cylinders2
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesDOHC
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement754 ccmDisplacement649 ccm

Suspension Rear

Shock absorberShock absorberMonoshockShock absorberMonoshock

Chassis

FrameFrameSteelFrameSteel
Frame typeFrame typeTubularFrame typePerimeter

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonDouble piston

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width170 mmRear tyre width160 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height60 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,130 mmLength2,110 mm
WidthWidth820 mmWidth770 mm
HeightHeight1,100 mmHeight1,110 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,460 mmWheelbase1,410 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height810 mmSeat Height805 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity14.5 lFuel Tank Capacity16 l

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Benelli 752 S 2020

Benelli 752 S 2020

If you like Italian design and the design language of MV Agusta's Brutale series in particular, you will find the Benelli 752 S a particularly stylish partner. The setup of the suspension and braking system is very well done, and the riding position is comfortably upright - in other words, it meets the standard you would expect on a modern mid-range naked bike. The engine's acceleration is also mediocre; more could certainly be achieved by revising the injection electronics. On the other hand, the features of the Benelli 752 S would fit into a higher class, with LED lighting all round, a fat USD fork and even a TFT colour display, it makes quite an impression.

attractive appearance

good sound

comfortable seating position

well-balanced suspension

powerful Brembo brakes

colour TFT display

Engine could be more powerful

hardly any adjustability in the display

design copied from MV Agusta

Read the full article on 1000PS.com

Kawasaki ER-6n 2016

Kawasaki ER-6n 2016

The engine is hearty and a lot of fun, plus the ER shines with a Japanese meticulous finish and a fighting price.

Solid handling

high quality level

weak brake

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Benelli 752 S vs Kawasaki ER-6n

Price Benelli 752 S

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Kawasaki ER-6n

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH