Suzuki GSX-S950 2021 vs. Kawasaki Z900 2020

Suzuki GSX-S950 2021

Suzuki GSX-S950 2021

Kawasaki Z900 2020

Kawasaki Z900 2020

Loading...

Overview - Suzuki GSX-S950 2021 vs Kawasaki Z900 2020

The Suzuki GSX-S950 2021 and the Kawasaki Z900 2020 are both naked bikes with similar engine types, fuel systems, and cooling mechanisms. However, there are several notable differences between the two models.

In terms of engine power, the Kawasaki Z900 2020 has a higher output with 125.4 HP compared to the Suzuki GSX-S950 2021's 95 HP. The Kawasaki Z900 also has a slightly higher torque of 98.6 Nm compared to the Suzuki's 92 Nm. This means that the Kawasaki Z900 may offer more aggressive acceleration and better top-end performance.

Both bikes feature upside-down telescopic forks for the front suspension and swing arm with a monoshock for the rear suspension. However, the Suzuki GSX-S950 2021 has an aluminum frame with a twin tube design, while the Kawasaki Z900 2020 has a steel frame with a double cradle design. The choice of materials and frame design may affect the overall weight and handling characteristics of the bikes.

Suzuki GSX-S950 2021

Suzuki GSX-S950 2021

In terms of braking, both models feature double disc brakes at the front with four-piston calipers. However, the Suzuki GSX-S950 2021 has larger front brake discs with a diameter of 310 mm compared to the Kawasaki Z900 2020's 300 mm discs. The Suzuki also utilizes radial technology for its front brakes, which may provide better braking performance and feel.

Both bikes come equipped with advanced rider assistance systems such as ABS, ride by wire, and traction control. However, the Kawasaki Z900 2020 offers additional riding modes, which can provide different performance profiles to suit various riding conditions.

In terms of dimensions and weights, the Suzuki GSX-S950 2021 has a slightly wider rear tire at 190 mm compared to the Kawasaki Z900 2020's 180 mm tire. The Suzuki also has a slightly longer wheelbase at 1460 mm compared to the Kawasaki's 1450 mm. The seat height of the Suzuki is 810 mm, while the Kawasaki's seat height is slightly lower at 795 mm. The Suzuki GSX-S950 2021 also weighs slightly more at 214 kg compared to the Kawasaki Z900 2020's 210 kg.

In terms of equipment, both bikes come with LED daytime running lights and LED headlights. However, the Kawasaki Z900 2020 also features a TFT display, which may provide more advanced and customizable information to the rider.

Kawasaki Z900 2020

Kawasaki Z900 2020

In terms of strengths, the Suzuki GSX-S950 2021 is praised for its engine's punch from below, good sound, stable brakes, and comfortable seating position. On the other hand, the Kawasaki Z900 2020 is commended for its powerful four-cylinder engine, great handling, good equipment, aggressive looks, and value for money.

In terms of weaknesses, the Suzuki GSX-S950 2021's chassis is criticized for being too soft and not adjustable, and its cockpit may be difficult to read in sunlight. The Kawasaki Z900 2020's menu navigation is considered somewhat tiring, and it lacks the option for a quickshifter.

Overall, both the Suzuki GSX-S950 2021 and the Kawasaki Z900 2020 offer their own unique strengths and weaknesses, and the choice between the two will ultimately depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.

Technical Specifications Suzuki GSX-S950 2021 compared to Kawasaki Z900 2020

Suzuki GSX-S950 2021
Kawasaki Z900 2020

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore73.4 mmBore73.4 mm
StrokeStroke59 mmStroke56 mm
Engine powerEngine power95 HPEngine power125.4 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power7,800 rpmRpm at Max. Power9,500 rpm
TorqueTorque92 NmTorque98.6 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque6,500 rpmRpm at Torque7,700 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12.2 Compression Ratio11.8
Fuel systemFuel systemInjectionFuel systemInjection
Throttle BoreThrottle Bore44 mmThrottle Bore36 mm
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Transmission TypeTransmission TypeGearshiftTransmission TypeGearshift
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders4Cylinders4
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesDOHC
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement999 ccmDisplacement948 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
DiameterDiameter43 mmDiameter41 mm
TravelTravel120 mmTravel120 mm

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionSwing arm
Shock absorberShock absorberMonoshockShock absorberMonoshock
Shock mountShock mountDeflectionShock mountDeflection
TravelTravel130 mmTravel140 mm

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameSteel
Frame typeFrame typeTwin TubeFrame typeDouble cradle
RakeRake65 degreeRake65 degree
TrailTrail100 mmTrail105 mm

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
DiameterDiameter310 mmDiameter300 mm
PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons
TechnologyTechnologyradialTechnologyPetal

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
DiameterDiameter250 mmDiameter250 mm
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonSingle piston

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS, Ride by Wire, Traction controlAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS, Riding modes, Ride by Wire, Traction control

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width190 mmRear tyre width180 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height50 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,115 mmLength2,070 mm
WidthWidth810 mmWidth820 mm
HeightHeight1,080 mmHeight1,065 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,460 mmWheelbase1,450 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height810 mmSeat Height795 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)214 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)210 kg
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Equipment

EquipmentEquipmentLED daytime running lights, LED-HeadlightsEquipmentLED daytime running lights, LED-Headlights, TFT display

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Suzuki GSX-S950 2021

Suzuki GSX-S950 2021

The "small" GSX-S950 is damn close to the GSX-S1000, which is why it seems as if the proud surcharge for the 1000 will have to be properly justified. However, anyone who wants it to be as sporty as on the GSX-S1000 will already fail due to the somewhat too soft, non-adjustable suspension. However, this more comfortable design of the 950 fits the character of the engine very well. With (only) 95 hp, the engine, which is identical to the GSX-S1000, is designed for torque from below and in the middle; there is little point in stubbornly wriggling out. So if you are looking for a comparatively comfortable naked bike that is suitable for A2 and that can hardly be distinguished visually from the top model, you can save a lot of money!

Engine with plenty of punch from below

good sound

stable brakes

comfortable seating position

Chassis too soft and not adjustable

cockpit not easy to read in sunlight

Kawasaki Z900 2020

Kawasaki Z900 2020

In terms of price-performance, the Kawasaki Z900 is hard to beat at the moment. With the perfectly tuned engine, the high-quality chassis components and the electronics added for 2020, this naked bike offers everything that sporty riders will be looking for. There is really nothing to complain about, even if the option of a quickshifter would have been a nice extra. Apart from that: great shot, Kawasaki!

powerful four-cylinder

great handling

good equipment

aggressive looks

value for money

Menu navigation somewhat tiring

missing quickshifter option

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Suzuki GSX-S950 vs Kawasaki Z900

There are a few key differences between a Suzuki GSX-S950 2021 and a Kawasaki Z900 2020. It takes less time to sell a Kawasaki Z900 with 124 days compared to 298 days for the Suzuki GSX-S950. Since model year 2021 1000PS.de editors have written 10 reviews for the Suzuki GSX-S950 and 46 reviews for the Kawasaki Z900 since model year 2017. The first review for the Suzuki GSX-S950 was published on 16/06/2021 and now has more than 37,200 views. This compares to more than 93,200 views for the first review on Kawasaki Z900 published on 11/11/2016.

Price Suzuki GSX-S950

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Kawasaki Z900

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH