BMW K 1300 S 2014 vs. Triumph Tiger 800 XC 2017

BMW K 1300 S 2014

BMW K 1300 S 2014

Triumph Tiger 800 XC 2017

Triumph Tiger 800 XC 2017

Loading...

Overview - BMW K 1300 S 2014 vs Triumph Tiger 800 XC 2017

BMW K 1300 S 2014

BMW K 1300 S 2014

Triumph Tiger 800 XC 2017

Triumph Tiger 800 XC 2017

Technical Specifications BMW K 1300 S 2014 compared to Triumph Tiger 800 XC 2017

BMW K 1300 S 2014
Triumph Tiger 800 XC 2017

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore80 mmBore74 mm
StrokeStroke64.3 mmStroke61.9 mm
Engine powerEngine power175 HPEngine power95 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power9,250 rpmRpm at Max. Power9,300 rpm
TorqueTorque140 NmTorque79 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque8,250 rpmRpm at Torque7,850 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio13 Compression Ratio12
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionProp shaftTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders4Cylinders3
DisplacementDisplacement1,293 ccmDisplacement799 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionStrutFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameSteel
Frame typeFrame typeTwin Tube, Load-bearing engineFrame typeTubular

Brakes Front

PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonDouble piston

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonDouble pistonPistonSingle piston
Shock mountShock mountFloating caliperShock mountFloating caliper

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width90 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height90 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter21 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width190 mmRear tyre width150 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height70 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,182 mmLength2,215 mm
WidthWidth905 mmWidth865 mm
HeightHeight1,221 mmHeight1,390 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,585 mmWheelbase1,545 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height820 mmSeat Height845 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity19 lFuel Tank Capacity19 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

BMW K 1300 S 2014

BMW K 1300 S 2014

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Triumph Tiger 800 XC 2017

Triumph Tiger 800 XC 2017

The new edition of the Tiger 800 XC can be considered quite successful. Even the "conventional" version can do much more than its predecessor thanks to the ride-by-wire system and standard traction control and ABS (both can be switched off). However, if you want to venture off-road more often, which is definitely what the designers had in mind thanks to the large wheels and spoke rims, you should choose the Tiger 800 XCx, which costs just under 1000 euros more. Thanks to the freely selectable riding modes, the x-version can be optimally tuned to the respective terrain. In addition, there is an engine guard, self-resetting turn signals, cruise control, main stand, underride protection, an additional 12V socket and hand protectors - which probably more than justifies the extra charge.

Great three-cylinder engine

cool sound

comfortable seating position

very easy to handle

off-road capable thanks to long suspension travel

comfortable chassis

selectable riding modes

adjustable ABS

adjustable traction control

extensive features

Visually hardly distinguishable from the predecessor

wind protection not optimal

footrests drag early with very sporty riding style

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price BMW K 1300 S vs Triumph Tiger 800 XC

Price BMW K 1300 S

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Triumph Tiger 800 XC

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH