Husaberg TE 125 2012 vs. Husqvarna WRE 125 2009

Husaberg TE 125 2012

Husaberg TE 125 2012

Husqvarna WRE 125 2009

Husqvarna WRE 125 2009

Loading...

Overview - Husaberg TE 125 2012 vs Husqvarna WRE 125 2009

Husaberg TE 125 2012

Husaberg TE 125 2012

Husqvarna WRE 125 2009

Husqvarna WRE 125 2009

Technical Specifications Husaberg TE 125 2012 compared to Husqvarna WRE 125 2009

Husaberg TE 125 2012
Husqvarna WRE 125 2009

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore54 mmBore54 mm
StrokeStroke54.5 mmStroke54.5 mm
StarterStarterKickStarterKick
DisplacementDisplacement124.8 ccmDisplacement124 ccm

Suspension Front

BrandBrandWPBrandSachs

Suspension Rear

BrandBrandWPBrandSachs

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

WheelbaseWheelbase1,475 mmWheelbase1,475 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height990 mmSeat Height935 mm
Dry WeightDry Weight97 kgDry Weight111.1 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity11 lFuel Tank Capacity9.5 l

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Husaberg TE 125 2012

Husaberg TE 125 2012

The little one with the somewhat nervous temperament joined the Swedish family only last year. The 125 is certainly not the easiest Husaberg to ride, but if you can master the TE 125, you can master all the others.

Feather-light dry weight

nimble on the move.

Chassis needs getting used to

steep ascents complicated.

Husqvarna WRE 125 2009

Husqvarna WRE 125 2009

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Alternative Comparisons